Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FB02009A8 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 15:58:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A27AA1609F5; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E9C1B1607A8 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 15:58:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 71708 invoked by uid 500); 17 May 2016 13:58:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 71685 invoked by uid 99); 17 May 2016 13:58:53 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:58:53 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7F7111A01CD for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:58:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mty38estjbvG for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B231861207 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 13:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id f89so24166919ioi.0 for ; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=+fCMzw94PKn7sbqkivF8pp9hPVx03ymNVxXM5dKFfAY=; b=Qu6Gh+NoGXlbFheEXgZvm9T7YqXQG76FhkG/gYsVbz7arfFc+3wN64Vap380qXBbbG tnaN6FONWC7F3DLWevz6c+ztnPIZvbf0gvcT+AP95KYCoCyg9xqx6B7QSSmopHHeWvo4 CRODf1/t6QPZV6Mx4zRJ6bh8gf1JAReN//SrZD33tNlOSiP50d7DZRJ+UKngZLidCdMC 2WhTgXTxK3yHsCWBWBBphZmNchuQMyUvpWBRQYgvm90mT9AtCAUgaXDwT6/gv2jEDG8Y Xu0Q7CYJZR0AJQ/uE1rHhfMVLJMcOhvnGasX8RC6tXt5/B6IHOnkAxn5pJFaFlrSVQRD EViQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=+fCMzw94PKn7sbqkivF8pp9hPVx03ymNVxXM5dKFfAY=; b=fxiYcB19j5pd52I5uPgrrrHGYh1s4BDsUq2rQMYRUPJIcbEV8x57rk5Yet5ymxTwuJ Qc2TZ5SwmzzTy//GHJ0fo/o6ccWSFC3lTil1IYna0ouTGkVAakr0Zxrt2aast1oRNfE6 0EegB82jjT4QyfE78DScLGjhjfGwbwyck586feiVyG+K8MRKCOO16E5kaUnyJ48NCLXc 4ggINVdDap+spxm1FrLtjO2LKFZY5/BS5X9UKDsI9j39k1dbSNbw0mVTKHkLjurAa2ZK 7NnpSAyExOTNEWVJWwGM2ZOW5M8dSkq80qfKzoHwgWCfPKk4i2hsoXcoTBV68VWJXwz4 71MA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXv5pWpYy6ejyoxUyzpaqfFnDLhhQjGVlLfqusfyXr7lRLF5viWOFQMMXE2D6aGF/2RKmKDB5gtYG/6ZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.155.132 with SMTP id o126mr13861646itd.95.1463493531084; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.156.149 with HTTP; Tue, 17 May 2016 06:58:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 09:58:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: json.facet streaming From: Yonik Seeley To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Tue, 17 May 2016 13:58:55 -0000 On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Nick Vasilyev wrote: > Hi Yonik, I do see them in the response, but the JSON format is like > standard facet output. I am not sure what streaming facet response would > look like, but I expected it to be similar to the streaming API. Is this > the case? Nope. The method is an execution hint (calculate the facets via this method), and should not normally affect what the response looks like. -Yonik