Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A0D619230 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23490 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2016 21:18:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23411 invoked by uid 500); 5 Apr 2016 21:18:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 23399 invoked by uid 99); 5 Apr 2016 21:18:50 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 21:18:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D8C1B1A47DD for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:18:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.299 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=johnbickerstaff-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cIlxiQOKxdAA for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com (mail-pf0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C6D7A5FAC9 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id c20so18431449pfc.1 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:18:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=johnbickerstaff-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=mG/1z3cwJDzCDjcwJMhH1tuZgzsFOtLSy2L3p7P2Og8=; b=sHAyogIv0TYUVALL2foAsns6salqlNrIO2aU6oHOXp8V1NIcJbOgQd/zEaI+RtKif5 nGgiwB6MrDoorSqnFt9Iyub1Kv/Hn8FV7mval7OmmL9HtWCVccrX6/kXsqEDETVbAwVe PRh1TFWolVTPEsjZcxFlzh2R/zjAalPDVXysXN8lH5iFNdwlX6i7nH7qlyeyWFOCZbLP I+NU2dUnqVjRH1BbU0RqgZgtG52EMT+/TK2PwRDEFTX8URHQa4Z+4rccLfhXvL3tMgqS rqktPAKmVTJb/o1DX513dAgiDvrexAgJ1+YiXUOv25slT0gk6dSwwMpGipEr7bf2SrA2 WWzQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=mG/1z3cwJDzCDjcwJMhH1tuZgzsFOtLSy2L3p7P2Og8=; b=KGS/OljCTQsORbzWKCFgWNlQvU7QTJxolnTWP32+5mtevOIIBN5lVks7bL95P4d0no OQeW12fPZvgWW3uTsdK8axVxryEM+BqeLjmKTMD8PP2iWOeFAALNi5cibb2XA+ftXapB Fr824t2qvqZedrAE0SfTl0nSswJEmK/nlrCbCcjnWARH9UDwzVYOAABmmW15iqeXjQgV aS1ZH4BKW3ZbiXRMur38d9K6zYmct/608QLmtIWl4IyXGcSV7Q8Sr0oxnejKMWCD3EQc tlnxPQ+kE6LeiTGLfYST75nu1Qrm0ESYHRtv2D4Vs6XrY5BDNQ3lOvM1Zac5Ryi0hjnj fvMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLv4NKi/L8O++0iN3YJKuUa3IPV1klMmwgtBU+H6X8Gr2Ex9DCsHSYFfSWv01PobXwrDXXaAVbSJbmKqg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.98.10.136 with SMTP id 8mr33197723pfk.67.1459891126877; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.150.196 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:18:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:18:46 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CompositId router From: John Bickerstaff To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114965480757b5052fc364bf --001a114965480757b5052fc364bf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In terms of #2, this might be of use... https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToReindex On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Anuj Lal wrote: > I am new to solr. Need some advice from more experienced solr team > members > > I am upgrading 4.4 solr cluster to 5.5 > > > One of the step I am doing for upgrade is to bootstrap from existing 4.4 > solr home ( after upgrading solr installation to 5.5) > > All of the nodes comes up correctly and I can query data after upgrade. No > issues here > > I am facing two issues . In 4.4 my collection is using compositId router > and routing field > > After upgrade I am seeing cluster status router as implicit and collection > router as implicit > > I tried upgrading cluster status with shard range and router as composite > and collection router as composite manually in zookeeper and restart > cluster. > ( Above I did based on this issue) > > After this status I see correct cluster status and collection router. > > When I update document, data is still not going to correct shard. Looks > like it is still using implicit router. > > Question > 1. What is the correct step for migration composit routed collection to > 5.5 . > 2. If I create collection again with rest api, how can i migrate data from > 4.4 to new collection > > Appreciate any help > > Thanks > Anuj > > > > --001a114965480757b5052fc364bf--