Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD32419672 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75567 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2016 16:11:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75496 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 2016 16:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 75484 invoked by uid 99); 16 Mar 2016 16:11:32 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:11:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8723EC03E9 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:11:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.821 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmt16aGHVX-f for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 60F275FB48 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x1so50980343lbj.3 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:11:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=G8xtnPf6PwkPHLQh+IOwK1ZEp3BYjyRq/nqP9eHMT78=; b=ECkb279EdOm0Mg29ANSTk/H+i+HrWNHGKJVOXAX41W3QQrSb1FdNN6poJe4uQhMyE4 UzAiFF54DBgxtoc10qlUfO5+q48uVfbX6VV8ImvPchI1IsdxX+WsPtUmjOzIEj/Zis8Q /Cp5WX0T0KsSswh3+hv4zQO61K/KwGvXoVKwe/TzlZL/iEgNBpnWTp3UdWEIFpqrsUpV 4jLXzzwJjdKs4iAd45bqymMEJqE/DaiCcUqMXXVCI1mEvGogQSPFoQb9KAyBpGx1oNzz wm2Pd3GN4zf0SxMZBeWaQ9HY2F5qJl84Oo7TeveOh0OYQmJzRVeUqbM5yL2rqhkEyZ87 QVGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=G8xtnPf6PwkPHLQh+IOwK1ZEp3BYjyRq/nqP9eHMT78=; b=eu+jtxrSpnc46NeKuVfjMD7/6CcxbQKQeLs+19Np2nfU5qdMTyZvp4mbm/MqDs8yZB wQtN8uPxQF/hgm2E0twzNQfJ8FBAqc5bWYbEdt4swpzdQJcHvxKtrCDp54or7ycQblxq WeQJGILCeXIPG40oopoevfh4LiXhhqjZnFIGyTKO4mOVOOSCbSDkBefYrxxKd4Bm7XiA nH11Q213utBbZzih2LeWbRGrsFAODuD39Pqsba+MKFuHBi0Wz+uAt5tWK5Hw3jwl++ds O1NdcCOKG05Hw3AwJLiOm6RH7K+fuDU8pBf5lhHWNDA4CdLEOXWL3GoeEE9nTpxM+O8+ nuwA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK50IV1ieA+P92h0L6pRLQJGTAsF6vgQYcFVXjFFrtmXpWDFH5l8rNq7BRuN2JNbqcFd8bnapyenMi1Jg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.173.71 with SMTP id bi7mr1773774lbc.93.1458144688057; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:11:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.91.193 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 09:11:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 16:11:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ping handler in SolrCloud mode From: Tom Evans To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Tom Evans wrote: > Hi all > > [ .. ] > > The option I'm trying now is to make two ping handler for skus that > join to one of items/products, which should fail on the servers which > do not support it, but I am concerned that this is a little > heavyweight for a status check to see whether we can direct requests > at this server or not. This worked, I would still be interested in a lighter-weight approach that doesn't involve joins to see if a given collection has a shard on this server. I suspect that might require a custom ping handler plugin however. Cheers Tom