Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4999C18EF3 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89859 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 05:43:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 89780 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jan 2016 05:43:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 89768 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jan 2016 05:43:50 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Jan 2016 05:43:50 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7FDEF1805F3 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:43:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.13 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.13 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DmJDNwo3lPW5 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f195.google.com (mail-yk0-f195.google.com [209.85.160.195]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 53257439E1 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 05:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f195.google.com with SMTP id y10so19974913ykf.0 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:43:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=mtnsGUhYCwuT2GK3YD9hh4TC6tQaWNSSletn28nyB1c=; b=0CC3zPtKYuE124xj4v+Do7b2LC8YVVRZDCbf1FkUaj+qDHudHoyPn58Lyq1JT8leNi GU1kGzcGx/pO6pyajOcRSzMwXC4lLRfyvtKXuxL0V2iP69IYr+IcNuB4Lmmz8gnyMUXF jmskT+W0r41wiO0DgXDMa+7ff0wgXma3zOFPvH4FZXQZuNQO5kvHnn1FS6i1SSxK1/Ac nVDEkvwzB4Z7OQHDUJTr7rNof1S1mjClbkTiqHAZyzO9y8CV8VhyKw4dzRajKGYiySZf 68noywtbNvd/0fTWsbb+9aFt8GEXynb4OuiVFoPFk9lLfpwvD00BJTHhm/An1FVChiwr 8Y+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.223.69 with SMTP id i66mr65116111ywe.323.1452231813781; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 21:43:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.228.196 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:43:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <55956039ba224349bc1230beb88f1ff3@DM2PR33MB032.059d.mgd.msft.net> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:43:33 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solrcloud for Java 1.6 From: Zap Org To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fcea06460c50528cc11df --001a114fcea06460c50528cc11df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 i have solrj5 client for 1.7 converted into 1.6 and solr instances running with 1.7. I am connecting solrj (1.6) wit solr instances(1.7) on two different machines On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:26 AM, wrote: > Run it on 2 separate boxes > > Bill Bell > Sent from mobile > > > > On Jan 7, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Aswath Srinivasan (TMS) < > aswath.srinivasan@toyota.com> wrote: > > > > Hi fellow developers, > > > > I have a situation where the search front-end application is using java > 1.6. Upgrading Java version is out of the question. > > > > Planning to use Solrcloud 5.x version for the search implementation. The > show stopper here is, solrj for solrcloud needs atleast java1.7 > > > > What best can be done to use the latest version of solrcloud and solrj > for a portal that runs on java 1.6? > > > > I was thinking, in solrj, instead of using zookeeper (which also acts as > the load balancer) I can mention the exact replica's > http://solr-cloud-HOST:PORT pairs using some kind of round-robin with > some external load balancer. > > > > Any suggestion is highly appreciated. > > > > Aswath NS > > > --001a114fcea06460c50528cc11df--