Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CE7A185CF for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94333 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2016 22:55:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94260 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2016 22:55:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 94249 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2016 22:55:29 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:55:29 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 56DDEC24AF for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:55:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.737 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.737 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88TyT_KeNHe2 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5446C20974 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 22:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mben.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.72]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4573100EA02B for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:49:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:55:20 -0700 (MST) From: vsriram30 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1453848920120-4253488.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1453769965652-4253226.post@n3.nabble.com> <56A6D0A7.5060101@elyograg.org> <1453831724519-4253412.post@n3.nabble.com> <1453832018749-4253415.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Solr partial date range search MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes Eric. I am using that full date form based date range query till now and we have a requirement change to search based on partial date ranges. Hence was looking at these options. Kind Regards, -Sriram -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-partial-date-range-search-tp4253226p4253488.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.