lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jamie Johnson <jej2...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Add support in FacetsComponent for facet.method=uif
Date Mon, 04 Jan 2016 03:13:06 GMT
Are you looking at 8466 or 8096?  The patch on 8466 is the one I'm
referencing.  I should remove the other as it is more change than I think
should be done for this ticket.

Jamie
On Jan 3, 2016 8:47 PM, "William Bell" <billnbell@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok the path appears to have dv and uif in there.?
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Jamie Johnson <jej2003@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The patch adds facet.method=uif and then delegates all of the work to the
> > JSON Faceting API to do the work.  I had originally added a
> facet.method=dv
> > and made the original facet.method=fc work using the UnInvertedField but
> > wanted to avoid making a change that would introduce unexpected behavior.
> > While I think it's strange that facet.method=dv does not exist and fc
> > defaults to dv I think if we wanted to change that it should be done in
> > another ticket.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:18 PM, William Bell <billnbell@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Interesting that facet.method=dv or facet.method=uif. What is the
> > > difference?
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2003@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > For those interested I created a separate jira issue for this but
> > forgot
> > > to
> > > > attach earlier.
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8466
> > > > On Jan 2, 2016 8:45 PM, "William Bell" <billnbell@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes we would like backward compatibility. We cannot switch all the
> > > facet
> > > > > fields to DocValues and our faceting is slow.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jamie Johnson <jej2003@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Is there any interest in this?  While i think it's important
and
> > > inline
> > > > > > with faceting available in the new json facet api, I've seen
no
> > > > > discussion
> > > > > > on it so I'm wondering if it's best I add support for this using
> a
> > > > custom
> > > > > > facet component even though the majority of the component will
> be a
> > > > copy
> > > > > > which is prefer to not need to maintain separately.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jamie
> > > > > > On Dec 22, 2015 12:37 PM, "Jamie Johnson" <jej2003@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I had previously piggybacked on another post, but I think
it
> may
> > > have
> > > > > > been
> > > > > > > lost there.  I had a need to do UnInvertedField based faceting
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > > FacetsComponent and as such started looking at what would
be
> > > required
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > implement something similar to what the JSON Facets based
API
> > does
> > > in
> > > > > > this
> > > > > > > regard.  The patch that I have in this regard works and
is
> > attached
> > > > to
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8096, is that
> > > appropriate
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > should I create a new ticket to specifically add this support?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Jamie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bill Bell
> > > > > billnbell@gmail.com
> > > > > cell 720-256-8076
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill Bell
> > > billnbell@gmail.com
> > > cell 720-256-8076
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Bell
> billnbell@gmail.com
> cell 720-256-8076
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message