Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 920C218EC4 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 98640 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2015 06:40:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98560 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2015 06:40:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 98548 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2015 06:40:28 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:40:28 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 331EBC9035 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:40:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.462 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.462 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gDnt1JQh8z_h for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f181.google.com (mail-io0-f181.google.com [209.85.223.181]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2389942AC6 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f181.google.com with SMTP id o67so321297995iof.3 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:40:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=q0/X+gw9c7lWXlhbM82eSHJfh3gj8X3boKyS7Xu7FU8=; b=URDWbbzjupiMNVUKQxPyJfU8cZb4SafGlWPrdz/BHe0XgdOG+dAnjFQsc7x8vu5/oc AvYiC4fL3U5xZ+S+2lMxe5ZZMkqZnYgV4HD783FfdasLBgdmR+DtM0mYjw4xQQ1GXB/m ESsNdNEOEM9rtYXiFATOvBjsCgpEhgeMAuIS2LIjOT2KrErdjb6R4Baaeew4z2Na0+hJ 54HgOJnBjS5oqe6nzgGTFA6yIYMAGb4a0Qalj3gCNAtvW+PGK2GUC+4uS2HIt5LS2zmC XX4vCNI4az4OtxzX12huH5haW/gKDufzqNm2ujRWHDDzE8k9UeOUZNOBTjmlFH//ZmHC yCSg== X-Received: by 10.107.164.206 with SMTP id d75mr53272553ioj.73.1451371220791; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 22:40:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1451285654167-4247512.post@n3.nabble.com> <1451295160333-4247517.post@n3.nabble.com> <1451365851254-4247648.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1451365851254-4247648.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Binoy Dalal Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:40:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how's multi-query scoring? To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142185a0d76d8052803b2fd --001a1142185a0d76d8052803b2fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Precisely. You can change how solr generates your phrase queries by tweaking the worddelimiterfactory settings or setting the autogeneratephrasequeries parameter for your fields to true or false. This will also determine whether or not pf boosting is applied. On Tue, 29 Dec 2015, 10:41 Jason wrote: > Hi, Binoy > Thanks your reply. > > I've found why score is same. > If I query with test:(chloro-4-hydroxy), then score is same. > But quering with test:(chloro 4 hydroxy), thean score of id 'test1' is > bigger than 'test2'. > So pf parameter under edismax is only applied to explicitly separated > queries. > In my case, quering with test:(chloro-4-hydroxy) generates implicit term > query like (chloro 4 hydroxy) by worddelimiterfilter. > So pf is not apppied. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-s-multi-query-scoring-tp4247512p4247648.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Regards, Binoy Dalal --001a1142185a0d76d8052803b2fd--