Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 14BB418207 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 60596 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 09:57:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60531 invoked by uid 500); 16 Dec 2015 09:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 60508 invoked by uid 99); 16 Dec 2015 09:57:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:57:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2F96FC531F for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:57:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.9 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAyJL_k30sDl for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 789CC43A06 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n186so63178453wmn.0 for ; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:57:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WJM+elq7J80V9eJW6ukTXXc4bpgRWCe2l44mxfML5YY=; b=WFJeuEvl1sBfIIUHeFIo9s8eucethDrZx1/2pI+9eMKcXjPKrpkyBLK+2f0vZOPpKX 4NOqks/uYtj5vY6UaARtRX7yXLhKKcQBrYiLOZUEijfc+0kJxnZTwI8pNoa0wqmHH2XS FahV4pSozyaTeunvXj8dPhGX0ttz1nOlzxcjODWHvaFQwG2NtV+eAXMAG5yiyTMrxbbJ iPfVwk8GDYIa+7yB8dxel7yKq9FBlAExWtmDufz5YvlqYTAkZCT0m1Ji2AnwN7SiEGb+ dwxAx6Jin4/0n3NDxH7mtzBXyTcwmUti67x5oGyPXIdfSDwojZTdyUVwfNFnMeezO30q lW6A== X-Received: by 10.194.178.202 with SMTP id da10mr48641514wjc.158.1450259841672; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:57:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.161.196 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 01:57:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <55FFF384.1030301@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de> <560522EF.4060703@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de> <5607CC32.4050707@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de> <56164450.5050803@hebis.uni-frankfurt.de> From: "Vincenzo D'Amore" Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:57:02 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: faceting is unusable slow since upgrade to 5.3.0 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d1ad8b1ecc2052700ee24 --089e013d1ad8b1ecc2052700ee24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, given that solr 5.4 is finally released, is this what's more stable and efficient version of solrcloud ? I have a website which receives many search requests. It serve normally about 2000 concurrent requests, but sometime there are peak from 4000 to 10000 requests in few seconds. On January I'll have a chance to upgrade my old SolrCloud 4.8.1 cluster to a new brand version, but following this thread I read about the problems that can occur upgrading to latest version. I have seen that issue SOLR-7730 "speed-up faceting on doc values fields" is fixed in 5.4. I'm using standard faceting without docValues. Should I add docValues in order to benefit of such fix? Best regards, Vincenzo On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote: > Uwe, it's good to know! I mean that you've recovered. Take care! > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Uwe Reh > wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay. I had an ugly flu. > > > > SOLR-7730 seems to work fine. Using docValues with Solr > > 5.4.0-2015-09-29_08-29-55 1705813 makes my faceted queries fast again. > > (90ms vs. 20000ms) :-) > > > > Thanks > > Uwe > > > > > > > > > > Am 27.09.2015 um 20:32 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev: > > > >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Uwe Reh > >> wrote: > >> > >> When 5.4 with SOLR-7730 will be released, I will start to use docValues. > >>> Going this way, seems more straight forward to me. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Sure. Giving your answers docValues facets has a really good chance to > >> perform in your index after SOLR-7730. It's really interesting to see > >> performance numbers on early 5.4 builds: > >> > >> > https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Solr-Artifacts-5.x/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/solr/package/ > >> > >> > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours > Mikhail Khludnev > Principal Engineer, > Grid Dynamics > > > > -- Vincenzo D'Amore email: v.damore@gmail.com skype: free.dev mobile: +39 349 8513251 --089e013d1ad8b1ecc2052700ee24--