Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94EA510D45 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41245 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2015 13:00:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 41179 invoked by uid 500); 20 Oct 2015 13:00:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 41167 invoked by uid 99); 20 Oct 2015 13:00:48 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:00:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 362401A2948 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:00:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.081 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.081 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, KAM_COUK=1.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikLUuTdwp3xb for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:00:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 0A60142B7B for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE1320F6D for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:00:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:00:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=myUx/UiBi+fKhMj VirVlHy8ULF0=; b=fUG92srBzwybrkzAY5r+p/H/XXdlGcEp2hpfyYoEUr2D/iP nssqGj4zYRorWZ+VgMVHOKRC3Vuet2YfnMAxPSHupbMwwltfMastD1XLjNNCGEIT qtEdUjZM9gLRUgtyaYNLstFw04Ffq5dKof3Qlxzzzv0laQB7frL+TzGWLs/s= Received: by web5.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5717FA6527F; Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:00:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1445346043.870240.415225233.77E2034E@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: CiH6zVgYWtwwGwYahGcj6ecRQF3daHT4xXi4quocPRuA 1445346043 From: Upayavira To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-25d3ec43 Subject: Re: Blob store, blob size & storage mechanism Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:00:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1445342193.845227.415172417.2C145AA9@webmail.messagingengine.com> Okay, thx. I heard it mentioned at Lucene Revolution as a location for storing machine learning models. Do people really have models coming in at under 2Mb? It'd be good to get this limitation into the BlobStore docs. Upayavira On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 07:19 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > No, the maximum size is limited to 2MB for now. The use-case behind > the blob store is to store small jars (custom plugins) and stopwords, > synonyms etc (even though those aren't usable right now) so maybe we > can relax the limits a little bit. However, it is definitely not meant > for GBs of data. > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Upayavira wrote: > > Is there a maximum size to objects in the blob store? How are objects > > stored? As a stored field? > > > > I've got some machine learning models that are 2-4Gb in size, and whilst > > machine learning models is one of the intended uses of the blob store, > > putting GB of data in it scares me a little. Is it reasonable and does > > it work? > > > > Upayavira > > > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar.