lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jack Krupansky <jack.krupan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Solr vs Lucene
Date Fri, 02 Oct 2015 20:02:32 GMT
Did you have a specific reason why you didn't want to send an HTTP request
to Solr to perform the spellcheck operation? I mean, that is probably
easier than diving into raw Lucene code. Also, Solr lets you do a
spellcheck from a remote client whereas the Lucene spellcheck needs to be
on the same machine as the Lucene/Solr index directory.

-- Jack Krupansky

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Mark Fenbers <mark.fenbers@noaa.gov> wrote:

> Thanks for the suggestion, but I've looked at aspell and hunspell and
> neither provide a native Java API.  Further, I already use Solr for a
> search engine, too, so why not stick with this infrastructure for spelling,
> too?  I think it will work well for me once I figure out the right
> configuration to get it to do what I want it to.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 10/1/2015 4:16 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>
>> If you want a spell checker, don’t use a search engine. Use a spell
>> checker. Something like aspell (http://aspell.net/ <http://aspell.net/>)
>> will be faster and better than Solr.
>>
>> wunder
>> Walter Underwood
>> wunder@wunderwood.org
>> http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message