Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 338F818C7A for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84110 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2015 15:48:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83900 invoked by uid 500); 23 Sep 2015 15:48:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83540 invoked by uid 99); 23 Sep 2015 15:48:04 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:48:04 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2CDB6181566 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:48:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.901 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.901 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opensourceconnections.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WySq6W1n6wD for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f179.google.com (mail-yk0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id B4AE442B0A for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 15:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykdt18 with SMTP id t18so45556534ykd.3 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opensourceconnections.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6jkonpXHQbqoWkI5oiD1zsa5NFrRm98+l+VhMmd0sGg=; b=W3QWVsVgd2Bw9yNRljrqrxur/6KxstS1109URQa+YR06tFl7vAj3ERdBp7/ZNCAlIM RMLJo741NaTHnrKI+n/v3xPN8znIqa2SAtxFNJ242a036l98ThXOEVVyZIDZBYXXm09n tHjemAZSrwdRwhfKV02qO+6pTyPAadSLltoSU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6jkonpXHQbqoWkI5oiD1zsa5NFrRm98+l+VhMmd0sGg=; b=W2K2NMWdAUW8hNfkBoHHCSayzZbjl/paPIRP7pEUx4T8hlQV75NWGqt9DuztKHHXtW 0SGvugkHLOCdaSFEeMw3+0OCaWQ8HVWSDfCCZM9lYqFAwyEZGptH7xcuMg5/4NXdczwa TwHj/C8QH6jBX3Cm9CWQ0kDdUNooHZWB0p2df7GsphlQWyBS0bdoYRVhU9d1NS/2XUJz lNplQr9t9RGXXzQVAooWhiZbdO2X0TUNNCVKue162FepWjvrpoJ6d2l15KccTQ6oPYz0 Bjsp9AhWY334Upbb4nr9stdr/W98nlxY0iYyk8SRlD64QbdreHV+PFKgs23v1dJ5eTxV f8Bg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8Z4laTPKFiV76P0c+ggjzLHDGQe+u4t/nSDfUPXejCPlNMEUzOLwu1FVyFURymGhPwR3R MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.213.17 with SMTP id x17mr25352849ywd.164.1443023269230; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.97.19 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:47:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1443017609.785990.391521249.04F6AF40@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <7d138a983ed9526484e78bf7891e5421@francelabs.com> <1443017609.785990.391521249.04F6AF40@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:47:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Taking Solr to production with docker From: Doug Turnbull To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Cc: Christopher Bradford Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114fb7f25dcaf305206c09a2 --001a114fb7f25dcaf305206c09a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Our test Solr and Elasticsearch instances for Quepid(http://quepid.com) are now hosted on docker (specifically kubernetes) It's worked pretty well. I'd suggest if you're curious to speak to my devops focussed colleague Chris Bradford that has a great deal of experience here. I haven't encountered any issues that would lead me to describe it as "not ready for production" Doug On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Upayavira wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015, at 02:00 PM, aurelien.mazoyer@francelabs.com > > wrote: > > Hi Solr community, > > > > I can find many blog posts on how to deploy Solr with docker but I am > > wondering if Solr/Docker is really ready for production. > > Has anybody ever ran Solr in production with Docker? > > Hi Aurelien, > > I'm wondering if there's anything specific that is needed to run Solr > inside Docker? Is there something you have in mind? > > Upayavira > -- *Doug Turnbull **| *Search Relevance Consultant | OpenSource Connections , LLC | 240.476.9983 Author: Relevant Search This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such. --001a114fb7f25dcaf305206c09a2--