Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 768D718256 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 19:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 85030 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2015 15:13:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84957 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2015 15:13:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 84945 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2015 15:13:38 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:13:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27309C0046 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:13:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 4.213 X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.213 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opensourceconnections.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_CI9y2AWpz0 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-f169.google.com (mail-yk0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8BB2F42B78 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 15:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ykdz80 with SMTP id z80so56808654ykd.0 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:13:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=opensourceconnections.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=CB+xr7R54MnFV3nPkMJN2HZRYxo9aH5NtanKPEK5QM0=; b=HDcGOL+O755J6wIkfJNkzcNCa7aWQvCyizoJFUEybdYmbog0o8211eRUW5JFCvZM4S 4DlbZ/a7EZGohnJnVIUhKTMgNSRHxn2cdXqLCmpMPl9wu2UdL2tPI+sYAQ7PlnhnPIVF qiDFq5/jeAw6F74nj2LuGg0JaGCg6MH2cHntw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CB+xr7R54MnFV3nPkMJN2HZRYxo9aH5NtanKPEK5QM0=; b=TLBUTNvT1zMsQXaz5tFCk8/KlRCGqWGenJzjdx2lDY55Fr9t8zruFRl9GDilrUlyeN d6NmEA88v5Gi9eLD+a1r5Ppof2pL+CT8AzORczFLERQHy2QmjFDN//ziLZXJig3xMSoR 61CTb+org3kD9Mo1yf7RA9SkEMMvcJhXHd4SpbIE9mfDcyD8Rc/jTwVLrGjrOb1AUuZc aAR6jDkjTCF4EUHzJTLWDaD83uMFa2p/4+Qo80yBotZ10t66JGgNYuJXA4O7930oNryp PDb7SK/qER+Yy7IDQ806DmlJuOqyguCoa8NqdDFbx7rZRELQXGVcUi+W9djE1jyISaUO NEoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyPW8u4v9dvOu9tM90pEG1aQq855HZDWWdCo4mlH9YI0o9FowJ6QhnBYYFaRWOffJkQFW4 X-Received: by 10.170.218.130 with SMTP id k124mr707630ykf.45.1440947605942; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:13:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.97.19 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Aug 2015 08:12:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1440942698571-4226146.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1440927807943-4226137.post@n3.nabble.com> <1440930593.3870079.369750121.224865CC@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1440936184436-4226143.post@n3.nabble.com> <1440942698571-4226146.post@n3.nabble.com> From: Doug Turnbull Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 11:12:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Using solr with cassandra To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Cc: Christopher Bradford Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a811e319664051e88c27b --001a113a811e319664051e88c27b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Pretty sure he was using HTTP, as Solr doesn't have another way to connect to it. Be curious what about HTTP caused botttlenecks, SolrJ has a number of strategies including using the load balancing SolrServer which forwards each document to the shards leader that might be useful to you. -Doug On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 9:51 AM, bipin wrote: > That was a very good presentation. I have used Spark before so yay. I had > also thought of using Solrcloud, it validates that. Regarding the api used > to connect to Solr, I found this > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Using+SolrJ. Is this the > same one that Chris was using. I want to know if he was using different way > to connect to Solr than HTTP requests because it had caused bottlenecks. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Using-solr-with-cassandra-tp4226137p4226146.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- *Doug Turnbull **| *Search Relevance Consultant | OpenSource Connections , LLC | 240.476.9983 Author: Relevant Search This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such. --001a113a811e319664051e88c27b--