Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BC5B18D2D for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58373 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58304 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 58289 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2015 13:57:14 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:57:14 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B7BA3DECDF for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:57:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.286 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.286 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZND64wCi3vs4 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mwork.nabble.com (mwork.nabble.com [162.253.133.43]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9B507428E7 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:57:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mben.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.72]) by mwork.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1199E2680FBE for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:57:04 -0700 (MST) From: Norgorn To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1439906224211-4223660.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1439904109306-4223651.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Solr cache for specific field MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm sorry for being so unclear. The problem is in speed - while node holds only several cats, it can answer with "numFound=0", if these cats are missed in query. It looks like: node 1 - cats 1,2,3 node 2 - cats 3,4,5 node 3 - cats 50,70 ... Query "q=cat:(1 4)" QTime per node now is like node1 - 1300 node2 - 1200 node3 - 1500 (sometimes) ... But I want to achieve node1 - 1300 node2 - 1200 node3 - 100 I know that /filterCache/ helps, but I don't want values for "cat" filter to be evicted at all. So I'm looking for a solution to keep separate cache, or something else. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-cache-for-specific-field-tp4223651p4223660.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.