lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Krüger <krue...@lesspain.de>
Subject Re: Embedded Solr now deprecated?
Date Wed, 05 Aug 2015 17:08:34 GMT
I just saw lots of deprecation warnings in my current code and a method
that was removed, which is why I asked.

Regarding the use case, I am embedding it with a desktop application just
as others use java-based no-sql or rdbms engines and that makes sense
architecturally in my case and is just simpler than deploying a separate
little tomcat instance. API-wise, I know it is the same and it would be
doable to do it that way. The embedded option is just the logical and
simpler choice in terms of delivery, packaging, installation, automated
testing in this case. The network option just doesn't add anything here
apart from overhead (probably negligible in our case) and complexity.

So our use is in production but in a desktop way, not what people normally
think about when they hear "production use".

Thanks everyone for the quick feedback! I am very relieved to hear it is
not on its way out and I will look at the api changes more closely and try
to get our application running on 5.2.1.

Best regards,

Robert

On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Where did you see that? Maybe I missed something yet
> again. This is unrelated to whether we ship a WAR if that's
> being conflated here.
>
> I rather doubt that embedded is "on it's way out", although
> my memory isn't what it used to be.
>
> For starters, MapReduceIndexerTool uses it, so it gets
> regular exercise from that, and anything removing it would
> require some kind of replacement.
>
> How are you using it that you care? Wondering what
> alternatives exist...
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Robert Krüger <krueger@lesspain.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to upgrade my application from solr 4 to 5 and just now realized
> > that embedded use of solr seems to be on the way out. Is that correct or
> is
> > there a just new API to use for that?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Robert
>



-- 
Robert Krüger
Managing Partner
Lesspain GmbH & Co. KG

www.lesspain-software.com

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message