Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D9A618AF6 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 03:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81583 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2015 03:20:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 81502 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2015 03:20:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 81490 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2015 03:20:13 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Jul 2015 03:20:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 776FCD18C4 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 03:20:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.129 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.129 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zr80V_7UeuDD for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 03:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 98BE743A5B for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2015 03:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so183062461wiw.0 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 20:19:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=S4irXNLQLTYHyXBO2cskoMJdKFQxRk8JtOSsNKhhcbs=; b=njJOZECS4Jba9J83hfCTwFfsJo/cc4qbO5OgtQAnCcUSQc+PRtHUm67MeOiyJkQFSj jVxRZV7tOzrMrxaQiuLe1Q1rCStwnv89kNdBLRNmfFYxyA5rpML/q3hEn2bweZUzT2yC /cxmE2Hc+/Ff8YxjiQEf0KcX/dhjXK2oVW+kSvp9h1sg1sZ9cP0cU0ySjXZQwDN8YCRp tk67khzcw5HgSs3yMRGDSxPCTueErvogtJRU45iuV5eSN5QU0Fk9A5VRyOr+JZu7r5R5 t1sn+g61Zh7B/wNGxjW4ts9tzsfGVPX1xQh+Cex42R0Lhp2ggqxJe09gcY+J4JGKbpYd Tqsg== X-Received: by 10.180.189.201 with SMTP id gk9mr12434788wic.53.1435807166781; Wed, 01 Jul 2015 20:19:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.27.210.146 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jul 2015 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Aman Tandon Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 08:49:07 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: DocValues: Which format is better Default or Memory? To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c352a0245ea60519dbe8c4 --001a11c352a0245ea60519dbe8c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I tried to use the docValues to reduce the search time, but when I am using the default format for docValues it is taking more time as compared to normal faceting technique (without docValues). Should I go for Memory format or there is something missing? *Note:-* I am doing the indexing at every 10 minutes and I am using solr 4.8.1 With Regards Aman Tandon --001a11c352a0245ea60519dbe8c4--