Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49B6618BDA for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55153 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2015 18:45:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55091 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jul 2015 18:45:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 55073 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jul 2015 18:45:25 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:45:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C4B9F189E67 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:45:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.111 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.111 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elyograg.org Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1l8bMq4P1Ny for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frodo.elyograg.org (frodo.elyograg.org [166.70.79.219]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8B0D020C4B for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by frodo.elyograg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6998854C9 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:44:55 -0600 (MDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elyograg.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1437417895; bh=K4wduS/bfE5yukLT+Z+MbbzL1xR4vsAXFFDLFHywz4I=; b=p j3x+2F+vv6acORyGiMlW+R87zUhmouSZBpxC6WhiWcZpcmVetJZMoHjyV7uPVw6U 61Bhx80T5pXvmaDs6z9lrPeOvBEIRAijFlreEf421Mr6WHSqF4qMk4y6ZOPX/jCm B42rhzgxXXTa7utE/7f6ss1On8asLrUmEHkLIWPDeI= X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frodo.elyograg.org Received: from frodo.elyograg.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frodo.elyograg.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id K2HvxGasM2J6 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:44:55 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.2.0.108] (client175.mainstreamdata.com [209.63.42.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: elyograg@elyograg.org) by frodo.elyograg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E9124404 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:44:52 -0600 (MDT) Subject: Re: solr blocking and client timeout issue To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org References: <55A97B7B.7080800@edgate.com> <55A9808F.4010707@elyograg.org> <1437172788348.78092@edgate.com> <55A98C60.3080802@elyograg.org> <55A9F56F.10202@edgate.com> <55AA6DC3.7030302@elyograg.org> <55AB47C1.1080401@edgate.com> <55AB7281.2080105@elyograg.org> <55AD35CF.3090106@edgate.com> From: Shawn Heisey Message-ID: <55AD419C.9010704@elyograg.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:44:44 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55AD35CF.3090106@edgate.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 7/20/2015 11:54 AM, Jeremy Ashcraft wrote: > I'm ugrading to the 1.8 JDK on our dev VM now and testing. Hopefully i > can get production upgraded tonight. > > still getting the big GC pauses this morning, even after applying the > GC tuning options. Everything was fine throughout the weekend. > > My biggest concern is that this instance had been running with no > issues for almost 2 years, but these GC issues started just last week. It's very possible that you're simply going to need a larger heap than you have needed in the past, either because your index has grown, or because your query patterns have changed and now your queries need more memory. It could even be both of these. At your current index size, assuming that there's nothing else on this machine, you should have enough memory to raise your heap to 5GB. If there ARE other software pieces on this machine, then the long GC pauses (along with other performance issues) could be explained by too much memory allocation out of the 8GB total memory, resulting in swapping at the OS level. Thanks, Shawn