Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E15B9179C0 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 87926 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2015 17:54:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 87863 invoked by uid 500); 27 May 2015 17:54:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 87845 invoked by uid 99); 27 May 2015 17:54:40 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:54:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6ADFE1822E7 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:54:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.992 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.992 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vToJiBNnL7Hv for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sbexch04.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk (sbexch04.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk [130.225.24.70]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E202E21021 for ; Wed, 27 May 2015 17:54:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sbexch04.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk (130.225.24.70) by sbexch04.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk (130.225.24.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:54:26 +0200 Received: from sbexch04.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk ([fe80::f1b4:8dae:d43:7ffc]) by sbexch04.sb.statsbiblioteket.dk ([fe80::f1b4:8dae:d43:7ffc%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Wed, 27 May 2015 19:54:26 +0200 From: Toke Eskildsen To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Subject: Re: HW requirements Thread-Topic: HW requirements Thread-Index: AQHQmJr7m6ykfo8KtUiJvtKrgirqqp2QGdoZ Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 17:54:26 +0000 Message-ID: <1432749262569.30247@statsbiblioteket.dk> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, da-DK, en-US Content-Language: en-GB X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [188.183.66.166] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Sznajder ForMailingList wrote:=0A= > Could you give me some hints wrt HW requirements for Solr if I need to=0A= > index about 400 Gigas of text?=0A= =0A= No. You are providing far too few data for us to guess.=0A= =0A= 400GB can be handled on a laptop or require 3 strong servers, depending on = what you intend to do with the data, how much the machine(s) will be used w= hile indexing and your requirements to speed.=0A= =0A= See https://lucidworks.com/blog/sizing-hardware-in-the-abstract-why-we-dont= -have-a-definitive-answer/=0A= =0A= - Toke Eskildsen=0A=