Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9206517DE8 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59203 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2015 15:39:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 59135 invoked by uid 500); 22 Apr 2015 15:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 59123 invoked by uid 99); 22 Apr 2015 15:39:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:39:44 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: message received from 54.164.171.186 which is an MX secondary for solr-user@lucene.apache.org) Received: from [54.164.171.186] (HELO mx1-us-east.apache.org) (54.164.171.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:39:38 +0000 Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9BA7A43E9C for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpi8 with SMTP id pi8so106568886igb.0 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=P4nEr/G4nJ+zlZ0774LZUkIrV9WJ+2p+GLStqvkfP54=; b=qM96MCE3+S81xfb7foFP7IE6ojlmU9wU3SBNYsHm2ANHj9HS2/T66Lk3PUC3hdR/9T 9bGTKeJ26YovY/M8iFy4TTRkERvPEqx6YyM/2d9qP+tJml4hkkdFlcBylrNi3W9orqZ/ vLbunifIXvyCruVEoMlUv9HEIoCoN2qkzqQLWhDASxQKCho9D1pH3f8tOEmeDhxTDfTm OdchC5xAKnisyPYa/xOG8HChHVl48ZIV8QS02cZW8rsV6Gpggwlxf1JLNXiTjpTUkTIG 1CcFpT1Jye+CRQLMBHVjODsT8bEEToE8tgCXpdAdejGSArKU3LtUV3j9yAfO56MTZzk/ flxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.196 with SMTP id y4mr5412549igl.14.1429717158300; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.93.147 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: dan@danizen.net In-Reply-To: References: <6D1F2E22C4DDA840B00A1CAFB3680ADD07FABD024D24@HE113608.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <20150422120112.5730449.15775.3975@gmail.com> <6D1F2E22C4DDA840B00A1CAFB3680ADD07FABD024F38@HE113608.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:39:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Odp.: solr issue with pdf forms From: Dan Davis To: solr-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01160412599070051451f708 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01160412599070051451f708 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 - I like Erick's answer. Let me know if that turns out to be the problem - I'm interested in this problem and would be happy to help. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Erick Erickson wrote: > Are they not _indexed_ correctly or not being displayed correctly? > Take a look at admin UI>>schema browser>> your field and press the > "load terms" button. That'll show you what is _in_ the index as > opposed to what the raw data looked like. > > When you return the field in a Solr search, you get a verbatim, > un-analyzed copy of your original input. My guess is that your browser > isn't using the compatible character encoding for display. > > Best, > Erick > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:08 AM, wrote: > > Thanks for your answer. Maybe my English is not good enough, what are > you trying to say? Sorry I didn't get the point. > > :-( > > > > > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: LAFK [mailto:tomasz.borek@gmail.com] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. April 2015 14:01 > > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org; solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Betreff: Odp.: solr issue with pdf forms > > > > Out of my head I'd follow how are writable PDFs created and encoded. > > > > @LAFK_PL > > Oryginalna wiadomo=C5=9B=C4=87 > > Od: Steve.Scholl@t-systems.com > > Wys=C5=82ano: =C5=9Broda, 22 kwietnia 2015 12:41 > > Do: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Odpowiedz: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Temat: solr issue with pdf forms > > > > Hi guys, > > > > hopefully you can help me with my issue. We are using a solr setup and > have the following issue: > > - usual pdf files are indexed just fine > > - pdf files with writable form-fields look like this: > > > Ich=EF=BF=BDbest=C3=A4tige=EF=BF=BDmit=EF=BF=BDmeiner=EF=BF=BDUnterschrif= t,=EF=BF=BDdass=EF=BF=BDalle=EF=BF=BDAngaben=EF=BF=BDkorrekt=EF=BF=BDund=EF= =BF=BDvollst=C3=A4ndig=EF=BF=BDsind > > > > Somehow the blank space character is not indexed correctly. > > > > Is this a know issue? Does anybody have an idea? > > > > Thanks a lot > > Best > > Steve > --089e01160412599070051451f708--