Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 378C510C31 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40730 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2015 18:37:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40664 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2015 18:37:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 40647 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2015 18:37:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:37:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gopalpatwa@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.49] (HELO mail-qa0-f49.google.com) (209.85.216.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:37:25 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v8so27651930qal.8 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:37:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nH/5r6bz3clLy07FjP5UXg3oxo7KkhF4TU+rhRfoyb4=; b=d6YX+piJu1oH+AKthmVkHqVSsL30UpUzoDQcpuuh2EGMp3o41vahIOHwiyk4xAIkaF Z0+0wxw2PMiDX3GSlS7WwSN5LKIkIFo4IUbuIETT7AgqV7vRmHsjIz/azaopjOhmRmRs cB12FM9ApvhtdOYh74WZfbUkuSMMkbpsXU+EG/6vr2aevAjSS92d6iX4vykNOprE0xh0 A/6qrFaOaW+CU73xIkdPjfWMU+dEOhKpkl2yLsp20pb35dVmXC4MwDpeXjoZFAQHF/br v6NWgVEw75cnZYVKadfuN0xsxZRuL3FggcPa9tsuN6HvEUI62Ev7Hm0DOjLB/aXYlm9B ZudQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.19.68 with SMTP id z4mr42042495qca.14.1423593443082; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:37:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.20.197 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:37:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54DA3A49.1090604@elyograg.org> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:37:23 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr on Tomcat From: Gopal Patwa To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11343a4c7ac692050ec02d28 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11343a4c7ac692050ec02d28 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I think until Solr become completely standalone, it could be major task for all folks who run Solr as war or repackage Solr war maven release to adopt 5.0 release, since they need to remove tomcat or any other container they have in production for running Solr. Not to mention there will tools build for those container to support logging and monitoring. And possibly people will still use unsupported war release to fulfill their needs until Solr standalone release become stable. For our use case we repackage solr war (maven release) to include some custom code which help us to test/debug/deploy our code easily. Most likely for us we have to create maven war artifact from solr.war locally and publish to our internal maven repository, so our current build and deploy process does not break. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Matt Kuiper wrote: > Thanks for all the responses. I am planning a new project, and > considering deployment options at this time. It's helpful to see where > Solr is headed. > > Thanks, > > Matt Kuiper > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apache@elyograg.org] > Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 10:05 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr on Tomcat > > On 2/10/2015 9:48 AM, Matt Kuiper wrote: > > I am starting to look in to Solr 5.0. I have been running Solr 4.* on > Tomcat. I was surprised to find the following notice on > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Running+Solr+on+Tomcat > (Marked as Unreleased) > > > > Beginning with Solr 5.0, Support for deploying Solr as a WAR in > servlet containers like Tomcat is no longer supported. > > > > I want to verify that it is true that Solr 5.0 will not be able to run > on Tomcat, and confirm that the recommended way to deploy Solr 5.0 is as a > Linux service. > > Solr will eventually (hopefully soon) be entirely its own application. > The documentation you have seen in the reference guide is there to prepare > users for this eventuality. > > Right now we are in a transition period. We have built scripts for > controlling the start and stop of the example server installation. > Under the covers, Solr is still a web application contained in a war and > the example server still runs an unmodified copy of jetty. Down the road, > when Solr will becomes a completely standalone application, we will merely > have to modify the script wrapper to use it, and the user may not even > notice the change. > > With 5.0, if you want to run in tomcat, you will be able to find the war > in the download's server/webapps directory and use it just like you do now > ... but we will be encouraging people to NOT do this, because eventually it > will be completely unsupported. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > --001a11343a4c7ac692050ec02d28--