lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: highlighting the boolean query
Date Mon, 23 Feb 2015 18:29:24 GMT
Highlighting is such a pain...

what does the parsed query look like? If the default operator is OR,
then this seems correct as both 'd' and 'c' appear in the doc. So
I'm a bit puzzled by your statement that "c" didn't contribute to the score.

If the parsed query is, indeed
a +b +c d

then it does look like something with the highlighter. Whether other
highlighters are better for this case.. no clue ;(

Best,
Erick

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> Erick,
>
> nope, we are using std lucene qparser with some customizations, that do not
> affect the boolean query parsing logic.
>
> Should we try some other highlighter?
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Erick Erickson <erickerickson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Are you using edismax?
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > In solr 4.3.1 there seem to be some inconsistency with the highlighting
>> of
>> > the boolean query:
>> >
>> > a OR (b c) OR d
>> >
>> > This returns a proper hit, which shows that only d was included into the
>> > document score calculation.
>> >
>> > But the highlighter returns both d and c in <em> tags.
>> >
>> > Is this a known issue of the standard highlighter? Can it be mitigated?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Dmitry Kan
>> > Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
>> > Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
>> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
>> > SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dmitry Kan
> Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
> Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
> SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info

Mime
View raw message