lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From jmlucjav <jmluc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: sample Cell schema question
Date Tue, 19 Aug 2014 11:12:58 GMT
no it does not.

Here the intent, I think, is not to duplicate stored info, as other
metadata fields like author, keywords etc already are stored, if 'text' was
stored (text is where all fields: content, author etc are copyed), then it
would contain some duplicate info.


On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Aman Tandon <amantandon.10@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I have a question, does storing the data in copyfields save space?
>
> With Regards
> Aman Tandon
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:02 PM, jmlucjav <jmlucjav@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ok, I had not noticed text contains also the other metadata like
> keywords,
> > description etc, nevermind!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:28 AM, jmlucjav <jmlucjav@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In the sample schema.xml I can see this:
> > >
> > >     <!-- Main body of document extracted by SolrCell.
> > >             NOTE: This field is not indexed by default, since it is
> also
> > > copied to "text"
> > >             using copyField below. This is to save space. Use this
> field
> > > for returning and
> > >             highlighting document content. Use the "text" field to
> search
> > > the content. -->
> > >     <field name="content" type="text_general" indexed="false"
> > > stored="true" multiValued="true"/>
> > >
> > >
> > > I am wondering, how does having this split in two fields text/content
> > save
> > > space?
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message