Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 867FF118E6 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 76187 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2014 07:42:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76111 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2014 07:42:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 76098 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2014 07:42:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:42:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of yannick.lallement@gmail.com does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 07:42:25 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WyytB-0008NA-3N for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:42:05 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:42:05 -0700 (PDT) From: yann To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1403509325094-4143375.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1403250426421-4143006.post@n3.nabble.com> Subject: Re: Solr alternates returning different versions of the same document MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Erik, thanks for your answer. I didn't manually assign docs to shards, I indexed all docs on one server, which then assigned it to shards (based on the default Solr behaviour, based on the document ID I believe). If I understood you correctly - this means the update section of the admin should be avoided when using a sharded install, because it doesn't guarantee a given document ID will be sent to the same shard as the previous version of the same document? Thanks Yann -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-alternates-returning-different-versions-of-the-same-document-tp4143006p4143375.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.