lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From harspras <Prasadta...@outlook.com>
Subject Re: Solr + SPDY
Date Sat, 17 May 2014 01:54:36 GMT
Hi Markus,

SPDY does provide lower latency in the case when I have multiple requests to the same server/domain.
It compresses the header and reduces the number of connections. But since it uses tls I am
not sure if it will be faster than http 1.1. That is why I wanted to test SPDY with solr for
inter shard communication. Currently, using http for communication to solr is slow. 

Harsh

> On 17-May-2014, at 9:44 am, "Markus Jelsma-2 [via Lucene]" <ml-node+s472066n4136507h35@n3.nabble.com>
wrote:
> 
> Hi Harsh, 
> 
>   
> Does SPDY provide lower latency than HTTP/1.1 with KeepAlive or is it encryption that
you're after? 
> 
>   
> Markus 
> 
> 
>   
> -----Original message----- 
> From:harspras <[hidden email]> 
> Sent:Tue 13-05-2014 05:38 
> Subject:Re: Solr + SPDY 
> To:[hidden email]; 
> Hi Vinay, 
> 
> I have been trying to setup a similar environment with SPDY being enabled 
> for Solr inter shard communication. Did you happen to have been able to do 
> it? I somehow cannot use SolrCloud with SPDY enabled in jetty. 
> 
> Regards, 
> Harsh Prasad 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4135377.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. 
> 
> 
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4136507.html
> To unsubscribe from Solr + SPDY, click here.
> NAML




--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-SPDY-tp4097771p4136544.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message