Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D32811F9B for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64846 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2014 21:03:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64762 invoked by uid 500); 10 Apr 2014 21:03:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 64752 invoked by uid 99); 10 Apr 2014 21:03:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:03:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mkhludnev@griddynamics.com designates 209.85.213.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.44] (HELO mail-yh0-f44.google.com) (209.85.213.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:02:57 +0000 Received: by mail-yh0-f44.google.com with SMTP id f10so4466784yha.31 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=griddynamics.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=8fyNRwmNd/5vn1eymG+P7WdijHM3t9AjDs9oiLS9pu0=; b=TeMslkc4ZDsF0ogxf2ualZiDR4E1c4v3r90VD1wNVLA/CIdabP3aQDNcUOhyl2Pkm+ UQAJV2c/AOkhQtk7zawzkxBMiVD6EGX5B7BYziDRdMetHTKEulZ0PmEJmdEsw3UVt6jN RoVZGSTOQ+zAI+ppHiL2LziuXQWXA9rIc9C9E= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8fyNRwmNd/5vn1eymG+P7WdijHM3t9AjDs9oiLS9pu0=; b=WKMZY5llIYYJhpqn+Zq5K21MYoOikRebnLleJbIVzXMvUSITxCdPcGcAsqTPXnH6AP QQRNmqX+ppfzkF/PDy/daJjbvcBY81+S1BVinX/LbkMcDKG+tSad+/ELoX+wvmpZFfxy cumwhVM9X/prd30BpMcnFGHKoVBwqJ58pcOp9xQJcR2MGeo04EJGYXUFs/Fyh+r4VbG4 mbOW0OCiLbB8BFgqWyIajiA1azZTQ2dvfQ6rnKZFAoXR4D3njwUF4Q8JEuVohgXwsMGv 4C4eogt41t8E2xwd1XSgsUpTXsEalC51jACKUrBSfuKu836YzfDNSZw5G5GyBbEBxzxl 5NUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmiesudZKIZy2ZCPS0YPgIjMYuQ6UbV8H94lQSnMkt8BmN+eUyc7yHgxytmpJce+8ava9jV X-Received: by 10.236.119.99 with SMTP id m63mr26227653yhh.65.1397163755225; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:02:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.170.135.213 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:01:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mikhail Khludnev Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 01:01:55 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Nested documents, block join - re-indexing a single document upon update To: solr-user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3011e28752df4404f6b6892a X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3011e28752df4404f6b6892a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, danny teichthal wrote: > > To make things short, I would like to use block joins, but to be able to > index each document on the block separately. > > Is it possible? > no way. use query time {!join} or denormalize then, field collapsing. -- Sincerely yours Mikhail Khludnev Principal Engineer, Grid Dynamics --20cf3011e28752df4404f6b6892a--