Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at
 spf.trusted-forwarder.org)
From: Jonathan Varsanik <jvarsanik@exponent.com>
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Solr interface
Thread-Topic: Solr interface
Thread-Index: AQHPTzrXh2j+oCNQr0+5WDC1des7HZsGDy9g
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 11:52:04 +0000
Message-ID: <9ACBCF1E47FB2C4E87A82A06DC9E85242429D889@SFMB01.exponent.com>
References: <1396528755.216177.32273.6482@mail.rambler.ru>
 <09A41478-B965-43BC-BC7F-926296A0D813@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <09A41478-B965-43BC-BC7F-926296A0D813@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Do you mean to tell me that the people on this list that are indexing 100s =
of millions of documents are doing this over http?  I have been using custo=
m Lucene code to index files, as I thought this would be faster for many do=
cuments and I wanted some non-standard OCR and index fields.  Is there a be=
tter way?

To the OP: You can also use Lucene to locally index files for Solr.


-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatcher@gmail.com]=20
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 8:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Solr User
Subject: Re: Solr interface

Yes. But why?

DataImportHandler kinda does this (still use http to kick off an indexing j=
ob).  And there's EmbeddedSolrServer too.=20

    Erik

> On Apr 3, 2014, at 8:39, =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2 =F7=C1=CE=C4=D9=DB=
=C5=D7 <a-wonder-v@rambler.ru> wrote:
>=20
> Is it possible to index files not via HTTP interface?