Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED30311F12 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89597 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2014 12:39:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 89549 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2014 12:39:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 89537 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2014 12:39:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:39:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 12:39:37 +0000 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2E320C17 for ; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:39:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=gQG3jSvhSYoyAKobl2xMUgr/BPY=; b=rfw ozV+S2ACVf88VWZxuzP/kivaN9EUEoPhxkXFzDoEXoQIaoCy+mVoFQEjS82dbDvI ht50GohXWZLY3KY7p9x6MkGZNNq4jtLCewvaWlRWbwgCuHGXBYtS6LSfJs3iZMih G8k8OD7MvSCUmXPiqGVQklNcOOrWo8HcM16lvJZQ= Received: by web1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id F311CF00AE0; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 08:39:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1397306354.21943.105706081.491252B0@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: pykHMIJugLeR/t9RzONt1xYjqEPCWPgpwWpt02Q7e3Q4 1397306354 From: Upayavira To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-5be85a12 In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Relevance/Rank Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:39:14 +0100 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Looks to me that the original query was using the lucene query parser, whereas bq is a parameter of the edismax query parser. This means that the bq param is being ignored. Move the fq clause to the q param, and add ^2000 after the name:123-444 bit. Upayavira On Fri, Apr 11, 2014, at 06:03 PM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions) wrote: > HI thanks Aman/Eric, > > I move part of the query under q=*:* and there is a difference in the > score and the Order. It seems work for me now. I use this and move > forward > > Thanks > > Ravi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aman Tandon [mailto:amantandon.10@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 12:02 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Relevance/Rank > > Its fine Erick, I am guessing that maybe* &fq=(SKU:204-161)... *this SKU > with that value is present in all results that's why Name products are > not getting boosted. > > Ravi: check your results without filtering, does all the results include > *SKU:204-161. > *I guess this may help. > > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Erick Erickson > wrote: > > > Aman: > > > > Oops, looked at the wrong part of the query, didn't see the bq clause. > > You're right of course. Sorry for the misdirection. > > > > Erick > > > > > > -- > With Regards > Aman Tandon