lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From A Laxmi <a.lakshmi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Boost Search results
Date Fri, 18 Apr 2014 20:17:32 GMT
Markus, like I mentioned in my last email, I have got the qf with title,
content and url. That doesn't help a whole lot. Could you please advise if
there are any other parameters that I should consider for solr request
handler config or the numbers I have got for title, content, url in qf
parameter have to be modified?

Thanks for your help..


On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:08 PM, A Laxmi <a.lakshmi458@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Markus, Yes, you are right. I passed the qf from my front-end framework
> (PHP which uses SolrClient). This is how I got it set-up:
>
>         $this->solr->set_param('defType','edismax');
>         $this->solr->set_param('qf','title^10 content^5 url^5');
>
> where you can see qf = title^10 content^5 url^5
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Markus Jelsma <markus.jelsma@openindex.io
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi, replicating full features search engine behaviour is not going to
>> work with nutch and solr out of the box. You are missing a thousand
>> features such as proper main content extraction, deduplication,
>> classification of content and hub or link pages, and much more. These
>> things are possible to implement but you may want to start with having you
>> solr request handler better configured, to begin with, your qf parameter
>> does not have nutchs default title and content field selected.
>>
>>
>> A Laxmi <a.lakshmi458@gmail.com> schreef:Hi,
>>
>>
>> When I started to compare the search results with the two options below, I
>> see a lot of difference in the search results esp. the* urls that show up
>> on the top *(*Relevancy *perspective).
>>
>> (1) Nutch 2.2.1 (with *Solr 4.0*)
>> (2) Bing custom search set-up
>>
>> I wonder how should I tweak the boost parameters to get the best results
>> on
>> the top like how Bing, Google does.
>>
>> Please suggest why I see a difference and what parameters are best to
>> configure in Solr to achieve what I see from Bing, or Google search
>> relevancy.
>>
>> Here is what i got in solrconfig.xml:
>>
>> <str name="defType">edismax</str>
>>        <str name="qf">
>>          text^0.5 features^1.0 name^1.2 sku^1.5 id^10.0 manu^1.1 cat^1.4
>>        </str>
>>        <str name="q.alt">*:*</str>
>>        <str name="rows">10</str>
>>        <str name="fl">*,score</str>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message