lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Chyla <roman.ch...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: w/10 ? [was: Partial Counts in SOLR]
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 05:08:19 GMT
perhaps useful, here is an open source implementation with near[digit]
support, incl analysis of proximity tokens. When days become longer maybe
itwill be packaged into a nice lib...:-)

https://github.com/romanchyla/montysolr/blob/master/contrib/adsabs/grammars/ADS.g
On 25 Mar 2014 00:14, "Salman Akram" <salman.akram@northbaysolutions.net>
wrote:

> Basically we just created this syntax for the ease of users, otherwise on
> back end it uses W or N operators.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Ahmet Arslan <iorixxx@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is no w/<int> syntax in surround.
> > /* Query language operators: OR, AND, NOT, W, N, (, ), ^, *, ?, " and
> > comma */
> >
> > Ahmet
> >
> >
> >
> > On Monday, March 24, 2014 9:46 PM, T. Kuro Kurosaka <kuro@healthline.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > On 3/19/14 5:13 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:> Hi,
> > >
> > > Guessing it's surround query parser's support for "within" backed by
> span
> > > queries.
> > >
> > > Otis
> >
> > You mean this?
> > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SurroundQueryParser
> >
> > I guess this parser needs improvement in documentation area.
> > It doesn't explain or have an example of the w/<int> syntax at all.
> > (Is this the infix notation of W?)
> > An example would help explaining difference between W and N;
> > some readers may not understand what "ordered" and "unordered"
> > in this context mean.
> >
> >
> > Kuro
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Salman Akram
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message