lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Sokolov <>
Subject Re: SOLRJ and SOLR compatibility
Date Thu, 06 Mar 2014 04:29:50 GMT
On 3/5/2014 1:36 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/4/2014 8:15 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>> Thanks, Tim, it's great to hear you say that!  I tried to make that
>> point myself with various patches, but they never really got taken up by
>> committers, so I kind of gave up, but I agree with you 100% this is a
>> critical feature if you want to get real-world large deployments to
>> accept frequent updates while continuing to innovate around the
>> communications protocol.
>> A key step would be getting a version number into the protocol so you
>> have a principled way of knowing which version is on the other end of
>> the wire.  I don't know what the state of this is now, but at one time
>> you had to kind of guess based on various secondary artifacts...
> The dev discussion appears to be going that direction.  We already have
> version numbers on the data encoding format (javabin, xml, etc.), we may
> need it for the content of the request as well.  See the newly added
> comments on SOLR-5762:
> Thanks,
> Shawn
I see - thanks, Shawn.  Sounds like moves towards progress on this.


View raw message