lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Della Bitta <michael.della.bi...@appinions.com>
Subject Re: Optimizing index on Slave
Date Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:27:06 GMT
I'm not really aware enough of the Solr/Lucene internals to tell you
whether that's possible or not.

One thing occurred to me: What happens if you take optimize out of the
replication triggers in the replication handler?

<str name="replicateAfter">optimize</str>


Michael Della Bitta

Applications Developer

o: +1 646 532 3062

appinions inc.

“The Science of Influence Marketing”

18 East 41st Street

New York, NY 10017

t: @appinions <https://twitter.com/Appinions> | g+:
plus.google.com/appinions<https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/112002776285509593336/112002776285509593336/posts>
w: appinions.com <http://www.appinions.com/>


On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Salman Akram <
salman.akram@northbaysolutions.net> wrote:

> Unfortunately we can't do sharding right now.
>
> If we optimize on master and slave separately the file names and sizes are
> same. I think it's just the version no that is different. Maybe if there
> was a to copy master version to slave that would resolve this issue?
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message