Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD7DB1069C for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33228 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2013 14:36:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 33138 invoked by uid 500); 29 Dec 2013 14:35:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 33130 invoked by uid 99); 29 Dec 2013 14:35:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:35:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of alexander.ramos.jardim@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.173] (HELO mail-pd0-f173.google.com) (209.85.192.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:35:49 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id p10so10495743pdj.18 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 06:35:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=xnA2YfHkeDNmCfBuvsWdnW24eRzgGwVJeDyoGOvqjCI=; b=rV72+zAxEuWeTx49PfL4jC3dfj1EYWOl3Vj5mTD3WGuI1QB0oWqCRpCw18gr9z+1hB uQRuKGrFetij5w2Yctr4sNhinCzrU9cPPJNtujaHWZS29017h4UVRTd5TVS4joFJVIwY 6Y4TEeXdgLC8JNKmrSnxd1EpHgdekF+lSs+tCj7hwl4qApylHFmr442lNh6/Ywz1MeJV OYV+KnOJ996hyksX9I71fVQThdsy6PAVHKbr7JDRkaGgZ73d9UktLK9uP/LNlppKQPut ODoNtq7JgFusUIKN7iHsX5D0p8CABqkVbFWbrTyzCuTUH5f3RyP5ujiX8hmAjvY3mJTR X9Vw== X-Received: by 10.68.229.10 with SMTP id sm10mr22385803pbc.154.1388327728727; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 06:35:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.70.131.15 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Dec 2013 06:35:08 -0800 (PST) From: Alexander Ramos Jardim Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:35:08 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Redis as Solr Cache To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b16050b1a4eb004eead3d72 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b16050b1a4eb004eead3d72 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 While researching for Solr Caching options and interesting cases, I bumped on this https://github.com/dfdeshom/solr-redis-cache. Does anyone has any experience with this setup? Using Redis as Solr Cache. I see a lot of advantage in having a distributed cache for solr. One solr node benefiting from the cache generated on another one would be beautiful. I see problems too. Performance wise, I don't know if it would be viable for Solr to write it's cache through the network on Redis Master node. And what about if I have Solr nodes with different index version looking at the same cache? IMO as long as Redis is useful, if it isn't to have a distributed cache, I think it's not possible to get better performance using it. -- Alexander Ramos Jardim --047d7b16050b1a4eb004eead3d72--