Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E3351003E for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82319 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2013 09:59:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82193 invoked by uid 500); 26 Oct 2013 09:59:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 82175 invoked by uid 99); 26 Oct 2013 09:59:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:59:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of saarcarmi@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.52] (HELO mail-pa0-f52.google.com) (209.85.220.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 09:58:53 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kl14so6443200pab.25 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=91fjRLzqKClxVvbBrqtG85kNolU639TkXT8sSz1ifvY=; b=BgBeNa+b3IjNVxPmsBQTyOhbOj7Cnl85MYxu9SHUZpgCzDljY+cPNMiVOJUx+RlWJq rH4Xxk3fA0DaD+wQho7QQJF6RI6qxZS791tN75T6f1TX8leUDCcd2sXSSHG0ZzDMUcmZ km9SGfs9g2Pgwc4rJp4lncMbreE8rHrPlHBtma6iyr8AKSpQ1fM4KzEg6yiZrSP64Icq 2dsJ1VXU8WtzR45LTZIui2uNDV9bJpDVVNVt0eQ0P1q+ZejgJP4lhvtBuJ9Jaun73e3n T1HtKfwkKKzrhn6ncw3eINA4g4Sk3gdKUNo0ksGVuYUOXR9iu+Tykg7f6/nzd8tOddhR oZbQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.113.195 with SMTP id ja3mr49769pbb.176.1382781511830; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.93.69 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.93.69 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 02:58:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6FDA77B4D3524101B9A718A846FDF72F@JackKrupansky> References: <6FDA77B4D3524101B9A718A846FDF72F@JackKrupansky> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 12:58:31 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr - what's the next big thing? From: Saar Carmi To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6dc7dad096fa04e9a1e8de X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b6dc7dad096fa04e9a1e8de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 LOL, Jack. I can imagine Otis saying that. Otis, with these marriage, are we going to see map reduce based queries? On Oct 25, 2013 10:03 PM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote: > But a lot of that big yellow elephant stuff is in 4.x anyway. > > (Otis: I was afraid that you were going to say that the next big thing in > Solr is... Elasticsearch!) > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- From: Otis Gospodnetic > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 2:43 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Solr - what's the next big thing? > > Saar, > > The marriage with the big yellow elephant is a big deal. It changes the > scale. > > Otis > Solr & ElasticSearch Support > http://sematext.com/ > On Oct 25, 2013 5:32 AM, "Saar Carmi" wrote: > > If I am not mistaken the most impressive improvement of Solr 4.0 compared >> to previous versions was the Solr Cloud architecture. >> >> What would be the next big thing in Solr 5.0 ? >> >> Saar >> >> > --047d7b6dc7dad096fa04e9a1e8de--