Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EC191061A for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13780 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 17:38:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13720 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2013 17:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 13704 invoked by uid 99); 16 Sep 2013 17:38:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:38:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nensor@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.48 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.48] (HELO mail-bk0-f48.google.com) (209.85.214.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:38:44 +0000 Received: by mail-bk0-f48.google.com with SMTP id my13so1665186bkb.7 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:38:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=faaMSzx6O56Hd5ZD36YOgvt31FO53iGekYbvOdwSLSo=; b=GCFv7Pjbf9JBNjdlpmpSP/Ynl9s9eYdXV8j2R53h0EkBxD7vI7L4VPOmLD4WDpijVL JUPr0jpt9uYiLKoSv7xnNyxi+uSxiMQAmjPnNwDOt/i4NGQG5pDdjPcvBQpyPogTqeih cj4cBpKaFfcUZ8mP0+EBZECY+TZw/TzgbBRCYy02yfe6IrR58UYtVc8VNGJmIvy6+3/k 5L8ygjG2/LVfqBRi9OUGu2dcwvQxQgdH4pvJ4JxsVML6Fq+VSlvNEbzxEc6/Bxx13f8D ZYve9d+NlzGxmJ/F/bCLKWO1Txu3I4BegqKR0gk8STTrKqb3tttmKrPiF0NmDYqIzPzp DLzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.204.71.133 with SMTP id h5mr25998522bkj.0.1379353103794; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.74.72 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:38:23 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: SOLR 4.2, slaves replicating reporting higher version number than master From: Neal Ensor To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b8747cac5c3ba04e683ab00 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b8747cac5c3ba04e683ab00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Having a strange intermittent issue with my 1 master, 3 slave solr 4.2 setup. On occasion, after indexing the master and replicating across the three slaves, each slave will start reporting they are one generation ahead (525 vs. 524 on the master) and thus out of sync. Replication runs appear to do nothing, and it seems to not really be affecting performance, it's just tickling my admin nerves. Any suggestions of what to look at? Just upgrade solr perhaps? 4.2 might be getting rather old... --047d7b8747cac5c3ba04e683ab00--