lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nalini Kartha <nalinikar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Getting term offsets from Solr
Date Sat, 21 Sep 2013 00:39:51 GMT
I'm wondering if storing just the offset as a payload would be cheaper from
storage perspective than enabling termOffsets, termVectors and
termPositions? Maybe we could get the offset info to return with results
from there then?

Thanks,
Nalini


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Nalini Kartha <nalinikartha@gmail.com>wrote:

> Thanks for the reply.
>
> We tried enabling these options but that's also causing too much index
> bloat so I was wondering if there's a way to get at the offset information
> more cheaply?
>
> Thanks,
> Nalini
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Jack Krupansky <jack@basetechnology.com>wrote:
>
>> Set:
>>
>> termVectors=true
>> termPositions=true
>> termOffsets=true
>>
>> And use the fast vector highlighter.
>>
>> -- Jack Krupansky
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Nalini Kartha Sent: Friday, September
>> 20, 2013 7:34 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Getting term
>> offsets from Solr
>>  Hi,
>>
>> We're looking at implementing highlighting for some fields which may be
>> too
>> large to store in the index.
>>
>> As an alternative to using the Solr Highlighter (which needs fields to be
>> stored), I was wondering if a) the offsets of terms are stored BY DEFAULT
>> in the index (even if we're not using the TermVectorComponent) and if so,
>> b) is there a way to get the offset information from Solr.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nalini
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message