Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D445810CF6 for ; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 18:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95926 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2013 18:42:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95740 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2013 18:42:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 95732 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2013 18:42:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:42:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of erickerickson@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.53] (HELO mail-vb0-f53.google.com) (209.85.212.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:42:38 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i3so2445358vbh.40 for ; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3BpovPBriwVzWXXeFqjbxP9tIz9kfFtYgZSnMMiix6Q=; b=u/Q2naMhCuEG9JZJbxis4fnBmJLb+h6vyZVWeW1ecdQ9YRyrkjEDZJD2SjYlEGfQ15 VhFPfdw2QDb3oxd8UVjaXhl/+cBRaig9tnd1DNkY0JSFBs29IDKf6MHFEJ0vgI1YHUSt ISBhcLvCj1Xc/ZuCN/FGKiVxM7zLUrRfYSZ7/VTuIUOVqEItTE0OhdBuYiNCN6jn4oE0 R1XBm+K4AAQNIhp7XWMhBee5C72a0DDOflwVUECHgEM4gDXBsD/Rue2bsJC61Sq5/j2V 3Cx+h6YLu0vv4UryF7e8MC0OzD6xRkJpN8UE+87EPQDiVmLo7NN6f67beNMBMHb2UN33 xHbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.74.69 with SMTP id t5mr927063vcj.18.1375382537003; Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.179.101 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Aug 2013 11:42:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51FA7206.5020002@elyograg.org> References: <51FA7206.5020002@elyograg.org> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 14:42:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SolrCloud separate indexer and Searcher From: Erick Erickson To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b624cbe8c670604e2e7336c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b624cbe8c670604e2e7336c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 To add to what Shawn said, do note that Solr 4.x can operate either in old-style master/slave mode or SolrCloud... Best Erick On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 8/1/2013 4:51 AM, Prasi S wrote: > > i am using solr 4.0 for indexing db content to a cloud . Currently i have > > two solr isntances running in separate app servers. Can I have a one solr > > separately as indexer instance and another as a searcher. > > > > This is possible in Master-Slave but does this hold good for SorlCloud > also? > > Because from what i understand, if Isetup two solr isntances, cloud > > automatically routes docuemtns to both the servers. > > Master/Slave does exactly what you describe. > > SolrCloud doesn't have master/slave concepts - it's a true cluster. > Indexing and querying both happen on all replicas in the cloud, > automatically. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > --047d7b624cbe8c670604e2e7336c--