Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D99E71006C for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2013 04:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35289 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2013 04:35:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35042 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2013 04:35:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 35034 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2013 04:35:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 04:35:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of billnbell@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.174] (HELO mail-ob0-f174.google.com) (209.85.214.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 07 Jul 2013 04:35:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id wd20so4308326obb.5 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:34:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=R07WRtu80JBlIQUIl534/Ye8LnRuv4aOr5LsbEHmFcI=; b=I6hlvh5wcNZGHJNnEolyDbllVupyCOewKoS6fdDo7RguTPm1MgXU9/ySQ3FTqcIZ6t aggm8Ea0/wv5Ak8g3Neqicqb1QGV9qgMWZl5yHaTJGxhInLzp2jf1Gtjw7SDB7jCAr9d 1y/2BSnJoiSOfkII5YjrhDvQ2J+pswh7LYAd/9FzhwDE+Se0bgWjMfNkOk4Su8V11JMg az7hAm+IM4OTjzr3lyaLm2DJSode67THjqaFcQHCWRPhUiZQOdhImXVrzlIEycUh9h3z qdQ/WnpkbJV90dhbaZVEsVgDQiSj279vDRTOMTWF8XS9OYE1/NtYp3b6uHUdibT0VoxY SnsA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.129.101 with SMTP id nv5mr16531320obb.56.1373171687995; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.140.45 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 21:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:34:47 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Lucene pass through for faceting in SOLR From: William Bell To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1ebe4adc01b04e0e472d2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb1ebe4adc01b04e0e472d2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I submitted a JIRA ticket a while ago, since I thought that having a way to use the Lucene facets in SOLR could speed up our faceting. However, no one seems to have picked up the development. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4774 What is involved with "hooking it into SOLR" ? Similar to the grouping I guess - or Geo Spatial ? Several people want to leave the SOLR facets in place, but why not extend it to include Lucene? One of things I was hoping for when combining the 2 Apache projects was to get these modules more integrated. Thanks. -- Bill Bell billnbell@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076 --e89a8fb1ebe4adc01b04e0e472d2--