Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C32DB10A9C for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:04:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22034 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2013 20:04:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21980 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jun 2013 20:04:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21972 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jun 2013 20:04:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:04:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of arunrangarajan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.182] (HELO mail-wi0-f182.google.com) (209.85.212.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:04:04 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m6so2249087wiv.15 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=dJzQCpdjc+ERYM8xGQryGURqQSskWXZX/3UZXHhAR00=; b=lLGJ/2+FjO2ddD2yix74d6S4kg+I0v+K7JUXxh9Z6cCE0Ub4s1QYtz1Nfi2d69/m4Y 98OLsYDbWEmTnFOp5oGubDEGqltPfnsH2RzO92UUuAWr6DVE/qx1jKpTtWek94bODt7Z 78PCas3esfckyQF4q4vrFLqlRjcV6eM2D3/ZGa8VSf5gBVV8mRnsRT7YXYynzxAPAn/W pFUdFmEFNtlBMyEnWHoBWpJkzyjOLVf0ut1JxiPIz6lFMa/W3/1fMjXu9eh6kameQNpL jKiLdeBcPgqB4brV3M+2ObXdBFV2w710FGm9Gtxn1SQz8Ey5ZEqy/YUwoKu+3VKX5USX l5Ug== X-Received: by 10.194.24.40 with SMTP id r8mr3947826wjf.7.1372277024338; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:03:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.11.98 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:03:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Arun Rangarajan Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:03:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr 4.2.1 - master taking long time to respond after tomcat restart To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d352891b9f504e014240f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d352891b9f504e014240f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks, Shawn & Jack. I will go with the wiki and use autoCommit with openSearcher set to false. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: > You need to do occasional hard commits, otherwise the update log just > grows and grows and gets replayed on each server start. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -----Original Message----- From: Arun Rangarajan > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:18 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Solr 4.2.1 - master taking long time to respond after tomcat > restart > > > Upgraded from Solr 3.6.1 to 4.2.1. Since we wanted to use atomic updates, > we enabled updateLog and made the few unstored int and boolean fields as > "stored". We have a single master and a single slave and all the queries go > only to the slave. We make only max. 50 atomic update requests/hour to the > master. > > Noticing that on restarting tomcat, the master Solr server takes several > minutes to respond. This was not happening in 3.6.1. The slave is > responding as quickly as before after restarting tomcat. Any ideas why only > master would take this long? > --047d7b5d352891b9f504e014240f--