Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17829F064 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66403 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2013 13:39:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66344 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2013 13:39:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 66336 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2013 13:39:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:39:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of furkankamaci@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.47] (HELO mail-oa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.219.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:38:59 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n9so192215oag.34 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Wr2nKh9MlROGB32RikcHUJcxzS7px3cvYzFbjyD5j6o=; b=F1Zk6PpCSaaX5IDFJjiuHmsfPVdTGUhz+UNRvX65OKi1SHpAFx4bmGYh8HjVl5gxKc 9JtgNn6NPlTvDZei5LKfudZvVwAV8Hab+4RajLh4MWQURMHNeuWrR9+wdBnoWW+5YoEO +YhmhiKUCx4YsLSjLIXGeltgZnAkuGXqh6omP5vNH3TIKpNfgkEHDHEKbVC2Qt4bSBlP PLWTgVyetrSI3AqjUhLuA3wNIAAkqULRn4fl+rB6gFrE2cqEDQYvQNRv1Z+zLpr0oQG8 o6sCL/U6KAysS9rrJd1rb5xMwd7mbBtI+2TGCRwm7qoDyZwKUxleFvIIcEQEp2uBqq90 zlPg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.142.230 with SMTP id rz6mr7744510oeb.22.1366033118581; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.143.163 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:38:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <713854D666B14CFBBF554DD3F94B7FD2@JackKrupansky> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:38:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SolrCloud Leaders From: Furkan KAMACI To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b41838bc8da6004da665e90 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b41838bc8da6004da665e90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Here writes something: https://support.lucidworks.com/entries/22180608-Solr-HA-DR-overview-3-x-and-4-0-SolrCloud-and says: Both leaders and replicas index items and perform searches. How replicas index items? 2013/4/15 Furkan KAMACI > Does leaders may response search requests (I mean do they store indexes) > at when I run SolrCloud at first and after a time later? > > > 2013/4/15 Jack Krupansky > >> When the cluster is fully operational, yes. But if part of the cluster is >> down or split and unable to communicate, or leader election is in progress, >> the actual count of leaders will not be indicative of the number of shards. >> >> Leaders and shards are apples and oranges. If you take down a cluster, by >> definition it would have no leaders (because leaders are running code), but >> shards are the files in the index on disk that continue to exist even if >> the code is not running. So, in the extreme, the number of leaders can be >> zero while the number of shards is non-zero on disk. >> >> -- Jack Krupansky >> >> -----Original Message----- From: Furkan KAMACI >> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 8:21 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: SolrCloud Leaders >> >> >> Does number of leaders at a SolrCloud is equal to number of shards? >> > > --047d7b41838bc8da6004da665e90--