Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 156DCF756 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 15:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64129 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2013 15:23:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63811 invoked by uid 500); 2 Apr 2013 15:23:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 63775 invoked by uid 99); 2 Apr 2013 15:23:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:23:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of furkankamaci@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.169] (HELO mail-ob0-f169.google.com) (209.85.214.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 15:23:10 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f169.google.com with SMTP id oi10so476141obb.0 for ; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2Sx/s4oRnoV1id2yH5qTxdQ6UFKuZy3yah8rTiyEl6U=; b=PbgfDaScQPJOWwrp4hVjFWA6AlUohf66OFT0MRxTSNoxMhymFkSXEbMk6LNlbow/NI 01esDaxtUuoKo2uH2JU2+ACZ1yDMPJNnMxdWiw5b2PB5i5MdcQp9gRfJssUzqi/N1Beh aw3qdFd2BK/dHo1pj6Xsazi8a9S8CD63yyhGs82hSFd0tnXwXaaE10SlQrxIbA9Gt1H/ Ua0f3l90vC57J6/GsWA0Oqx5tNIk+fHdIO05Kd7G4GR6uf7TOus1taKtRiTmgBoWdm8c Z1yuWZchpTZxMhUe9oHA7klFkjC3esNA3vD9UfCNbzyXlhlvw43ssYFVjUtLBCzGgD6P G8Dg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.11.8 with SMTP id m8mr5882421oeb.22.1364916169672; Tue, 02 Apr 2013 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.143.163 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Apr 2013 08:22:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2A385536298644B39D70F1D6AC13731C@gmail.com> References: <515AE939.8070900@r.email.ne.jp> <515AED38.9080609@kelkoo.com> <2A385536298644B39D70F1D6AC13731C@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 18:22:49 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Flow Chart of Solr From: Furkan KAMACI To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb20548710d1e04d9624f67 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --e89a8fb20548710d1e04d9624f67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You are right about mentioning developer doc and user doc. Users separate about it. Some of them uses Solr for indexing and monitoring via admin face and that is quietly enough for them however some people wants to modify it so it would be nice if there had been some documentation for developer side too. 2013/4/2 Yago Riveiro > For beginners is complicate understand the complexity of solr / lucene, > I'm trying devel a custom search component and it's too hard keep in mind > the flow, inheritance and iteration between classes. I think that there i= s > a gap between software doc and user doc, or maybe I don't search enough > T_T. Java doc not always is clear always. > > The fact that I'm beginner in solr world don't help. > > Either way, this thread was very helpful, I found some very good resource= s > here :) > > Cumprimentos > > -- > Yago Riveiro > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > > > Actually maybe one the most important core thing is that Analysis part = at > > last diagram but there is nothing about it i.e. stamming, lemmitazing > etc. > > at any of them. > > > > > > 2013/4/2 Andre Bois-Crettez andre.bois@kelkoo.com)> > > > > > > > > On 04/02/2013 04:20 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote: > > > > > > > (13/04/02 21:45), Furkan KAMACI wrote: > > > > > > > > > Is there any documentation something like flow chart of Solr. i.e= . > > > > > Documents comes into Solr(maybe indicating which classes get > documents) > > > > > and > > > > > goes to parsing process (i.e. stemming processes etc.) and then > reverse > > > > > indexes are get so on so forth? > > > > > > > > > > There is an interesting ticket: > > > > > > > > Architecture Diagrams needed for Lucene, Solr and Nutch > > > > https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/LUCENE-2412< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2412> > > > > > > > > koji > > > > > > I like this one, it is a bit more detailed : > > > > > > http://www.cominvent.com/2011/**04/04/solr-architecture-**diagram/< > http://www.cominvent.com/2011/04/04/solr-architecture-diagram/> > > > > > > -- > > > Andr=E9 Bois-Crettez > > > > > > Search technology, Kelkoo > > > http://www.kelkoo.com/ > > > > > > > > > Kelkoo SAS > > > Soci=E9t=E9 par Actions Simplifi=E9e > > > Au capital de =80 4.168.964,30 > > > Si=E8ge social : 8, rue du Sentier 75002 Paris > > > 425 093 069 RCS Paris > > > > > > Ce message et les pi=E8ces jointes sont confidentiels et =E9tablis = =E0 > > > l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires. Si vous n'=EAtes pas le > > > destinataire de ce message, merci de le d=E9truire et d'en avertir > > > l'exp=E9diteur. > > > > > > > > > > > > --e89a8fb20548710d1e04d9624f67--