Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of solrexpert@gmail.com designates
 209.85.223.179 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB_8Yd9+K1cRnpnCJ4Wdr4pJB2ZmUQm7uFWaTZ=phtoJk0AF6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAHUAEU931f+EOZjtDfVkfYxCqMea3r9_BGUXLH7y=-NSsJAEHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHUAEU-GU1f0NVk9Mdk2Syf_q+UKHTJTcBinyS8N1NR+r-TxTQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHUAEU8KXPWb_ka6Nsi36ZerxA5+8RD-N1cZVP5bvMZCL0BquA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB_8Yd9+K1cRnpnCJ4Wdr4pJB2ZmUQm7uFWaTZ=phtoJk0AF6A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 17:16:45 +0300
Message-ID: 
 <CAHUAEU83w+67S_75Wa8a5ZkZHgGG8r+POOo4S7XHcJwT9z0s7A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [solr 3.4] anomaly during distributed facet query with 102 shards
From: Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd7691e808de104db3011bf

--047d7bd7691e808de104db3011bf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks, Yonik. Yes, I supposed that. We are in the pre-release phase, so we
have the pressure.

Solr 3.4.

Would setting up 4.2.1 router work with 3.4 shards?
On 25 Apr 2013 17:11, "Yonik Seeley" <yonik@lucidworks.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Dmitry Kan <solrexpert@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any distrib facet gurus on the list? I would be ready to try
> > sensible ideas, including on the source code level, if someone of you
> could
> > give me a hand.
>
> The Lucene/Solr Revolution conference is coming up next week, so I
> think many are busy creating their presentations.
> What version of Solr are you using?  Have you tried using a newer
> version?  Is it reproducable with a smaller cluster?  If so, you could
> try using the included Jetty server instead of Tomcat to rule out that
> factor.
>
> -Yonik
> http://lucidworks.com
>

--047d7bd7691e808de104db3011bf--