Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of docbook.xml@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.52 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <74BBAE83-F932-4AE4-A19B-566D3F552D0A@wunderwood.org>
References: 
 <CABDm0O_u02e8XG+=z6t=iv=+ULj8ZF+426DT4x0YsqVRE7RTtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<74BBAE83-F932-4AE4-A19B-566D3F552D0A@wunderwood.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:52:23 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CABDm0O_7B_t96W0vedQjzJdRZjRt+WsW2AwFu46M-tPsh3RRSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Storing Solr Index on NFS
From: "Ali, Saqib" <docbook.xml@gmail.com>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec520edabb0332e04da691302

--bcaec520edabb0332e04da691302
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hello Walter,

Thanks for the response. That has been my experience in the past as well.
But I was wondering if there new are things in Solr 4 and NFS 4.1 that make
the storing of indexes on a NFS mount feasible.

Thanks,
Saqib


On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Walter Underwood <wunder@wunderwood.org>wrote:

> On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Ali, Saqib wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Are there any issues with storing Solr Indexes on a NFS share? Also any
> > recommendations for using NFS for Solr indexes?
>
> I recommend that you do not put Solr indexes on NFS.
>
> It can be very slow, I measured indexing as 100X slower on NFS a few years
> ago.
>
> It is not safe to share Solr index files between two Solr servers, so
> there is no benefit to NFS.
>
> wunder
> --
> Walter Underwood
> wunder@wunderwood.org
>
>
>
>

--bcaec520edabb0332e04da691302--