Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC793FDCE for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21529 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2013 08:33:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21484 invoked by uid 500); 19 Apr 2013 08:33:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 21468 invoked by uid 99); 19 Apr 2013 08:33:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:33:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of qibaoyuan@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.53 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.53] (HELO mail-da0-f53.google.com) (209.85.210.53) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:33:02 +0000 Received: by mail-da0-f53.google.com with SMTP id n34so1848003dal.12 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 01:32:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=oM9JZc/DqYQJkrPjFi1ybTELOctD0n6jYcUdB0ESE3c=; b=i7qg/kZmdI+oBOchOcgqpulBByygi6YLwTcFfIzWeNMsuqkmBBDEWAIxIOpqZqszff 0Wb7n7bSuGrNvSK65dl720WnkS0jpCpjw88WK+G6A6JB+Wo4uHib4Id8Azp/d8cfEf5K tJc6luadHIOILSE521EZnVt/+jl3cdN6jv2WTt/sP3wIxuw3NLwP+BzmW3C7foQ1lCpu IZdr4B5/Hc6qXYPu3H4IXN2KRXuQ7Wc/06MGJxThuBEOyA1/9xqYBMPAaSxujmbFqye7 QA9pgy+45T3XB68mRehAiQ8Hw2VsUpjnZ0MPpq8CvymJveNervwc4meFCyyWbNLZnpGx wB4Q== X-Received: by 10.68.179.131 with SMTP id dg3mr17681378pbc.193.1366360360914; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 01:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from puma-vm2003.net.lexotech.com ([124.205.30.62]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4sm7134057pbo.6.2013.04.19.01.32.37 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 01:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: solr-cloud performance decrease day by day From: qibaoyuan In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:32:32 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks manu,i will check it. =D4=DA 2013-4-19=A3=AC=CF=C2=CE=E74:26=A3=ACManuel Le Normand = =D0=B4=B5=C0=A3=BA > Can happen for various reasons. >=20 > Can you recreate the situation, meaning restarting the servlet or = server > would start with good qTime and decrease from that point? How fast = does > this happen? >=20 > Start by monitoring the jvm process, with oracle visualVM for example. > Monitor for frequent garbage collections or unreasonable memory peacks = or > opening threads. > Then monitor your system to see if there's an io disk latency or disk = usage > that increases in time, the writing queue to disk exploads, cpu load > becomes heavier or network usage's exeeds limit. >=20 > If you can recreate the decrease and monitor well, one of the above = params > should pop up. Fixing it after defining the problem will be easier. >=20 > Good day, > Manu > On Apr 19, 2013 10:26 AM, "qibaoyuan" wrote: