Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7EDB10B36 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41380 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2013 17:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 41328 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2013 17:12:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 41319 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2013 17:12:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:12:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=SPF_SOFTFAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of skmirch@hotmail.com does not designate 216.139.236.26 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:12:51 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UV3F9-0002Tt-6c for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:12:31 -0700 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:12:31 -0700 (PDT) From: SandeepM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Message-ID: <1366823551177-4058655.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <8F0D0142CA7ECC4287A9EC1BD8CB880C1A07B1FDF6@USLVDCMBVP01.ingramcontent.com> References: <1366345962635-4057176.post@n3.nabble.com> <8F0D0142CA7ECC4287A9EC1BD8CB880C1A0767FDB2@USLVDCMBVP01.ingramcontent.com> <1366393652420-4057389.post@n3.nabble.com> <8F0D0142CA7ECC4287A9EC1BD8CB880C1A077DA90B@USLVDCMBVP01.ingramcontent.com> <1366657303220-4058048.post@n3.nabble.com> <8F0D0142CA7ECC4287A9EC1BD8CB880C1A07963E16@USLVDCMBVP01.ingramcontent.com> <1366664618860-4058086.post@n3.nabble.com> <8F0D0142CA7ECC4287A9EC1BD8CB880C1A079640C3@USLVDCMBVP01.ingramcontent.com> <1366744362094-4058400.post@n3.nabble.com> <8F0D0142CA7ECC4287A9EC1BD8CB880C1A07B1FDF6@USLVDCMBVP01.ingramcontent.com> Subject: RE: DirectSolrSpellChecker : vastly varying spellcheck QTime times. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org One of our main concerns is the solr returns the best match based on what it thinks is the best. It uses Levenshtein's distance metrics to determine the best suggestions. Can we tune this to put more weightage on the number of frequency/hits vs the number of edits ? If we can tune this, suggestions would seem more relevant when corrected. Also, if we can do this while keeping maxCollation = 1 and maxCollationTries = "some reasonable number so that QTime does not go out of control" that will be great! Any insights into this would be great. Thanks for your help. Regards, -- Sandeep -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DirectSolrSpellChecker-vastly-varying-spellcheck-QTime-times-tp4057176p4058655.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.