Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6BEBE3B3 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39820 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2013 18:24:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 39735 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2013 18:24:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 39727 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2013 18:24:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:24:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:24:28 +0000 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.44]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FE5207B6 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:24:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.215]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:24:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=BNhbZ/Wew1S0C+7b/j7xCRJSqQo=; b=cfGxu 0g3Atlmvc1NLmXdVuXeT/YDFmhHqYqmZYBk3aK+Cs8xtCbRrjwKRoZhA8D6WpqCJ 7bhkt1USdDDYAjKrTZLozVO5ltgmKVub0+rYclkGcA3gkE0towexHxJJr8GhMTPs JxxKdjNkZC1yPOc12H95164xonrtklNZOUbxQ8= Received: by web5.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id BC30E4C253F; Sun, 13 Jan 2013 13:24:07 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1358101447.31212.140661177027157.4D7C0F9B@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: KpwNMY9stgbvjdkcWhCp/I84hSIJO3a9mjdadvaKPtGW 1358101447 From: Upayavira To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-33d24f93 Subject: Re: Index sharing between multiple slaves Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:24:07 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1358092798723-4033006.post@n3.nabble.com> References: <1355231412857-4025996.post@n3.nabble.com> <1355244381.32640.140661164705389.0493E243@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1358092798723-4033006.post@n3.nabble.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It can work, so I believe. However, it is not normal Solr usage, so you are less likely to find people who can support you in it. Upayavira On Sun, Jan 13, 2013, at 03:59 PM, suri wrote: > Sorry, might have shared more info. Planning to have Index files in NAS > and > share these index files across multiple nodes. We have 4 slave nodes. For > redundancy we might be having 2 nodes per a shared index. Any issues you > foresee with this. I will post details once we test this. > > Cheers, > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-sharing-between-multiple-slaves-tp4025996p4033006.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.