Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of
 SRS0=2VkTHF=JY=basetechnology.com=jack@yourhostingaccount.com designates
 65.254.253.44 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <295E921148504349B6D1769EE549B055@JackKrupansky>
From: "Jack Krupansky" <jack@basetechnology.com>
To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
References: <183ED04B56E14808B0258FBB7F35322F@JackKrupansky>
 <zarafa.50b616af.61df.5b9e00b42e1f61e0@mail.openindex.io>
In-Reply-To: <zarafa.50b616af.61df.5b9e00b42e1f61e0@mail.openindex.io>
Subject: Re: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:49:09 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="UTF-8";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Sender: "Jack Krupansky" <jack@basetechnology.com>

Edismax is considered Solr, although the same issue exists in the Lucene 
query parser.

-- Jack Krupansky

-----Original Message----- 
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 8:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax

I think i agree. Is this something that should be resolved in Solr or 
Lucene?

Thanks

-----Original message-----
> From:Jack Krupansky <jack@basetechnology.com>
> Sent: Tue 27-Nov-2012 17:47
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax
>
> That is exactly the exception I would expect to see given your scenario. 
> The
> fact that the situation may have been silently ignored in the past was
> surely an oversight that has since been corrected.
>
> My proposal would be that if the query parser (actually the code that
> generates PhraseQuery) encounters a phrase and the field does not have
> positions, a BooleanQuery with MUST would be generated instead of the
> PhraseQuery.
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Markus Jelsma
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 4:27 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax
>
> Hi - no we're not getting any errors because we enabled positions on all
> fields that are also listed in the qf-parameter. If we don't, and send a
> phrase query we would get an error such as:
>
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: field "h1" was indexed without position
> data; cannot run
> PhraseQuery (term=a)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.search.PhraseQuery$PhraseWeight.scorer(PhraseQuery.java:274)
> at
> org.apache.lucene.search.DisjunctionMaxQuery$DisjunctionMaxWeight.scorer(DisjunctionMaxQuery.java:160)
> at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:589)
> at org.apache.lucene.search.IndexSearcher.search(IndexSearcher.java:280)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListAndSetNC(SolrIndexSearcher.java:1518)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.getDocListC(SolrIndexSearcher.java:1265)
> at
> org.apache.solr.search.SolrIndexSearcher.search(SolrIndexSearcher.java:384)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.QueryComponent.process(QueryComponent.java:411)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.component.SearchHandler.handleRequestBody(SearchHandler.java:204)
> at
> org.apache.solr.handler.RequestHandlerBase.handleRequest(RequestHandlerBase.java:129)
> at org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore.execute(SolrCore.java:1555)
> at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.execute(SolrDispatchFilter.java:442)
> at
> org.apache.solr.servlet.SolrDispatchFilter.doFilter(SolrDispatchFilter.java:263)
>
> We have fields in qf that we don't need to be searched for explicit phrase
> queries so we'd like to omit positions, offsets and so on. But if we do,
> we'll get the above error for explicit phrase queries.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> > From:Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
> > Sent: Tue 27-Nov-2012 02:15
> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: positions and qf parameter in (e)dismax
> >
> >
> > : We do not want to store positions for some fields or omit term and
> > : positions (or just tf) for other fields. Obviously we don't need/want
> > : explicit phrase matching on the fields we want to configure without
> > : positions, but (e)dismax doesn't let us. All text fields configured in
> > : the QF parameter are eligible for explicit phrase matching and need to
> > : have positions. We're looking for a way to disable what we don't need
> > : and prevent Solr from searching fields for phrases that we don't want 
> > to
> > : be searched on.
> >
> > I'm not understanding the problem ... is there a specific error you are
> > getting? can you please post that error along with your schema and an
> > example of a request that triggers the problem?
> >
> > -Hoss
> >
>
>