Return-Path: 
 <solr-user-return-71384-apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive=lucene.apache.org@lucene.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 934BCDD29
	for <apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Wed,  5 Sep 2012 01:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 12919 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 01:55:29 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12861 invoked by uid 500); 5 Sep 2012 01:55:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:solr-user-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
List-Id: <solr-user.lucene.apache.org>
Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12851 invoked by uid 99); 5 Sep 2012 01:55:29 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:55:29 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.160.48] (HELO mail-pb0-f48.google.com) (209.85.160.48)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2012 01:55:20 +0000
Received: by pbbrq13 with SMTP id rq13so122143pbb.35
        for <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>;
 Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.213.138 with SMTP id ns10mr49980201pbc.157.1346810098513;
        Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frisbee.local (250.185-62-69.ftth.swbr.surewest.net.
 [69.62.185.250])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ox5sm251589pbc.75.2012.09.04.18.54.56
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:54:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Hostetter <hossman_lucene@fucit.org>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Using a sum of fields in a filter query
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAFiDPQe4vXxhpNevtL8-BEHBJ3pi0t_wUZFDe7mzM=K-N3_YYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1209041853010.2764@frisbee>
References: 
 <CAFiDPQctJ2sTz_idBt87XNKMpcJygdqN0JN0n+=w1AEOMbjWgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <793878321.20120904092544@alud.com.pl>
 <CAFiDPQe4vXxhpNevtL8-BEHBJ3pi0t_wUZFDe7mzM=K-N3_YYQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323329-1186878953-1346810097=:2764"

--8323329-1186878953-1346810097=:2764
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT


: The piece I was also missing as well was to add:
: <queryParser name="functionparser"
: class="org.apache.solr.search.FunctionQParserPlugin"/>

a) the FunctionQParserPlugin is already registered by default using hte 
name "func" -- you shouldn't need to register it explicitly unless you 
want to use it with a custom name.

b) the FunctionQParserPlugin is not even required in order to use 
"FunctionRangeQParserPlugin" (aka: "frange") that Rafał suggested for 
filtering by function range...

: > fq={!frange l=0 u=100}sum(fielda, fieldb, fieldc)



-Hoss
--8323329-1186878953-1346810097=:2764--