Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E65CAD6C3 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12413 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2012 10:00:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 12184 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2012 10:00:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 12164 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2012 10:00:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:00:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of phil@friendsreunited.co.uk designates 195.245.230.34 as permitted sender) Received: from [195.245.230.34] (HELO mail1.bemta3.messagelabs.com) (195.245.230.34) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:00:34 +0000 Received: from [195.245.230.83:38566] by server-2.bemta-3.messagelabs.com id 5C/AE-04862-EA5C9405; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:00:14 +0000 X-Env-Sender: phil@friendsreunited.co.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-208.messagelabs.com!1347012013!24894259!1 X-Originating-IP: [194.247.84.117] X-StarScan-Received: X-StarScan-Version: 6.6.1.3; banners=-,-,- X-VirusChecked: Checked Received: (qmail 1001 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2012 10:00:13 -0000 Received: from scanmail.scotland.net (HELO scanmail.scotland.net) (194.247.84.117) by server-11.tower-208.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 7 Sep 2012 10:00:13 -0000 Received: from [213.128.235.28] (helo=BSOL-DUN-CAS3.scotlandonline.local) by scanmail.scotland.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1T9vMD-0001Ev-00 for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:00:13 +0100 Received: from BSOL-DUN-MBX4.scotlandonline.local ([::1]) by BSOL-DUN-CAS3.scotlandonline.local ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 11:00:11 +0100 From: Phil Hoy To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" Subject: Core used for distributed queries Thread-Topic: Core used for distributed queries Thread-Index: Ac2MWd6YQwQcDFpqSDmN9/NPqFzaKw== Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 10:00:11 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2.102.253.63] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B34B86C16C24CA4284A487BF5BF090DE1A405B31bsoldunmbx4scot_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_B34B86C16C24CA4284A487BF5BF090DE1A405B31bsoldunmbx4scot_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, For distributed queries when a solr server has multiple cores in a collecti= on and a collection wide query is submitted, is one core in particular used= to aggregate and distribute the query to the appropriate cores in the coll= ection? Phil --_000_B34B86C16C24CA4284A487BF5BF090DE1A405B31bsoldunmbx4scot_--