Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E3A7D41D for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83258 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 11:26:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83212 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2012 11:26:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 83196 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2012 11:26:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:26:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of erik.hatcher@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.176] (HELO mail-gh0-f176.google.com) (209.85.160.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:26:04 +0000 Received: by ghbz10 with SMTP id z10so3478616ghb.35 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:25:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=1hfEsFJjl2xp2cgYiTD/q3mIvOEQQ7dkN5WLdoSc/50=; b=nKeMYOK7mbkafNcdGNukLIATNldy9WmdBqZs2/SYoFMdykn2y+GFTDCkY8rIxnt0Fo 5e8kqRMZHVRwQDk3jip0Ah4eNJxBsAaJvFkVdB3Lyx7f7pXyIDdI1uAVU5mQJgHQKcMj 6rQXZzlzwA7rBlPa4oKXF7p/U3U+/YMFmo3LixKtRJyb03z0NyxXWEMge9ALN2fB1IPP N2ZJs95+CXAuFPTWGRVLDUC+wBQMqAU5km3v8Pklpo8CQuV/z1GreqEZQ5GDWyV/tOJg QVveFUyJNINVvaDacVGbCR3QPN+A2FXwZL7i/j/NaUJn5ekY1OCd0dE2nr4tGk3G64GS KDQg== Received: by 10.236.153.164 with SMTP id f24mr907390yhk.83.1345116344166; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (c-24-125-38-32.hsd1.va.comcast.net. [24.125.38.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e5sm7854227yhi.12.2012.08.16.04.25.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 04:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: Can two Solr share index? From: Erik Hatcher In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 07:25:41 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alex - what you're looking for is called "replication" - = http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication Erik On Aug 16, 2012, at 04:48 , Alex King wrote: > Hi all, > We use Solr to build a search service for our customers. We have got = one > core on one physical machine. When our site will be ready and running = it > could potentially be very busy with serving search results to users. = But I > want to perform indexing of new documents without affecting Solr = search > performance. (there can be huge amount of documents at one time) > We figured out that we can have one Solr only for search and another = (or > more in the future) Solr to do the indexing. Those Solrs should = eventually > have the same index (it isn't neccessery to synchronize those indexes = every > time new document was added, but I want the search Solr to get new > documents, lets say ones in a week). > So my question is: it a good idea, at all? ;) And how can I accomplish > this? Can Solrs share index? Or should I copy the index from indexing > machine to search machine (how to do it technically? is there some = special > tool for this purpose?) > Regards, > Alex