Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 894E997BA for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 16:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8369 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2012 16:15:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-lucene-solr-user-archive@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 8243 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2012 16:15:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact solr-user-help@lucene.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list solr-user@lucene.apache.org Received: (qmail 8234 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2012 16:15:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:15:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of SRS0=Q5WICK=FF=basetechnology.com=jack@yourhostingaccount.com designates 65.254.253.139 as permitted sender) Received: from [65.254.253.139] (HELO mailout17.yourhostingaccount.com) (65.254.253.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:15:03 +0000 Received: from mailscan17.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.17] helo=mailscan17.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout17.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1SmSDy-0001TQ-Hi for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:14:42 -0400 Received: from impout01.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.1] helo=impout01.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan17.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1SmSDx-0001YU-Vq for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:14:41 -0400 Received: from authsmtp06.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.6]) by impout01.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id WGEh1j00C07rVmq01GEhGp; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:14:41 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=aoEw+FlV c=1 sm=1 a=sNxxokvI1LyqtxdLLXP0YQ==:17 a=aQzbgH187woA:10 a=dJtn70gffRwA:10 a=3jZET7lWBKwA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=jvYhGVW7AAAA:8 a=mV9VRH-2AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=r4Z2JIknqdZ9dDH8H48A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=fsJ80uyv01TBpq5N3xWxAg==:117 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.6 X-EN-IMPSID: WGEh1j00C07rVmq01GEhGp Received: from c-66-41-251-232.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([66.41.251.232] helo=JackKrupansky) by authsmtp06.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1SmSDx-0002bk-Mo for solr-user@lucene.apache.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 12:14:41 -0400 Message-ID: <03684FD94ACA402AB8D4010935F96649@JackKrupansky> From: "Jack Krupansky" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: difference between stored="false" and stored="true" ? Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 11:14:40 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-EN-UserInfo: e0a4b55451ed9f27313ebf02e3d4348d:fc4a93e1349e680c52bdd723c0ab3ef6 X-EN-AuthUser: jack@basetechnology.com Sender: "Jack Krupansky" X-EN-OrigIP: 66.41.251.232 X-EN-OrigHost: c-66-41-251-232.hsd1.mn.comcast.net 1. The "useless" combination of stored=false and indexed=false is useful to "ignore" fields. You might have input data which has fields that you have decided to ignore. 2. Stored fields take up memory for documents (fields) to be returned for search results in the Solr query response, so fewer stored fields is better for performance and memory usage. -- Jack Krupansky -----Original Message----- From: Amit Nithian Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 12:54 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: difference between stored="false" and stored="true" ? So couple questions on this (comment first then question): 1) I guess you can't have four combinations b/c index=false/stored=false has no meaning? 2) If you set less fields stored=true does this reduce the memory footprint for the document cache? Or better yet, I can store more documents in the cache possibly increasing my cache efficiency? I read about the lazy loading of fields which seems like a good way to maximize the cache and gain the advantage of storing data in Solr too. Thanks Amit On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > Thank you Fran�ois and Jack for those explainations. > > Cheers, > GGhh > > 2012/6/30 Fran�ois Schiettecatte: >> Giovanni >> >> means the data is stored in the index and [...] > > > 2012/6/30 Jack Krupansky: >> "indexed" and "stored" are independent [...]