lucene-solr-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: 4.0.ALPHA vs 4.0 branch/trunk - what is best for upgrade?
Date Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:02:23 GMT
Anything currently in the trunk will most probably be in the BETA and
in the eventual release. So I'd go with the trunk code. It'll always
be closer to the actual release than ALPHA or BETA....

I know there've been some changes recently around, exactly
the "collection" name. In fact there's a discussion about
rearranging the whole example directory....

Best
Erick

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Roman Chyla <roman.chyla@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it intentional that the ALPHA release has a different folder structure
> as opposed to the trunk?
>
> eg. collection1 folder is missing in the ALPHA, but present in branch_4x
> and trunk
>
> lucene-trunk/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/xslt/example_atom.xsl
> 4.0.0-ALPHA/solr/example/solr/conf/xslt/example_atom.xsl
> lucene_4x/solr/example/solr/collection1/conf/xslt/example_atom.xsl
>
>
> This has consequences for development - e.g. solr testcases do not expect
> that the collection1 is there for ALPHA.
>
> In general, what is your advice for developers who are upgrading from solr
> 3.x to solr 4.x? What codebase should we follow to minimize the pain of
> porting to the next BETA and stable releases?
>
> Thanks!
>
>   roman

Mime
View raw message